| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
An Overview of RR Buildtech
RR Buildtech is a builder engaged in the real estate market, specifically operating within Punjab. While the company has undertaken various projects, it has encountered some legal challenges that potential buyers should be aware of. This blog delves deep into the legal status of RR Buildtech, examining their history of complaints and the outcomes of legal cases that define their operations.
Legal History of RR Buildtech
Complaints and Case Outcomes
RR Buildtech has faced a total of 2 complaints, resulting in no cases won and 2 cases lost. This indicates a worrying pattern for potential buyers, as it suggests ongoing issues with customer satisfaction and compliance with property delivery timelines.
Analysis of Cases
Cases Lost
In both instances where RR Buildtech lost, the central issue revolved around delays in possession of flats. The complainants sought interest on delayed possession, specifically from 19.08.2018 until valid possession was handed over. Notably, both cases resulted in the authority ordering the builder to pay interest at a rate of 9.30% per annum during the delay period. The respondent (RR Buildtech) was proceeded against ex-parte, which means they did not respond or defend themselves in these legal proceedings. This lack of defense might indicate either negligence or operational challenges faced by the builder.
Cases Won
Interestingly, upon reviewing the claims, RR Buildtech was technically found to be on the losing side in cases where they did not defend themselves. The builder did not win any cases outright, thus reflecting a consistent theme of unresolved customer grievances leading to judicial interventions.
Common Patterns
- Common Factors in Lost Cases: The primary factor in the lost cases has been the problem of delayed possession, which has resulted in formal complaints from buyers. The builder’s failure to respond to these complaints has also contributed significantly to their adverse legal outcomes.
- Common Factors in Won Cases: There are no cases won by RR Buildtech, indicating that they have not successfully defended against any claims made by complainants.
Conclusion: Evaluating RR Buildtech
Based on the provided data, RR Buildtech's legal history raises several red flags. With 2 complaints and a complete lack of successful defenses, potential customers should approach with caution. The clear trend of unresolved delays in possession could indicate systemic issues within the builder's operational framework.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Conduct Thorough Research: Before making any commitments, prospective buyers should thoroughly research RR Buildtech's history and seek out reviews from current and past customers.
- Ask About Delays: Directly inquire about previous delays in possession timelines and how the builder has addressed these complaints. Transparency is key.
- Legal Safeguards: Consider legal advice when reviewing contracts to understand rights and provisions in case of potential delays or issues.
General Tips for Selecting a Builder
- Check Complaints and Legal Records: Always investigate a builder's history of complaints and legal battles to assess their reliability.
- Look for Customer Feedback: Seek testimonials and communicate with previous buyers to gauge their satisfaction levels.
- Visit Completed Projects: If possible, visit some of the builder’s completed projects to evaluate quality and compliance with timelines.
In summary, while RR Buildtech has an active presence in Punjab, their legal complications could pose significant risks for potential property buyers. Proceed with caution and ensure to take informed steps when considering any investment in real estate.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against RR Buildtech, where the builder lost, revealed several key insights across the board. The cases primarily revolved around two common themes: Delayed Possession Claims and Interest Payment Disputes.
The Delayed Possession Claims encompassed complaints primarily made by flat buyers who alleged that the builder had failed to deliver possession of their flats on time. In these cases, the complainants sought interest compensation at prescribed rates for the delay, which highlights a pattern of dissatisfaction with the builder's ability to meet project timelines.
The Interest Payment Disputes arose from the builders' failure to respond adequately to the claims made by the complainants. In each case, the builder was proceeded against ex-parte, indicating a lack of defense or a failure to provide sufficient evidence to refute the claims. This led to the authority ordering interest payments at a rate of 9.30% per annum in both cases, demonstrating a consistent legal expectation regarding timely possession and compensation for delays.
A notable observation from these cases is the recurring reason for the disputes: the builder’s inability to offer valid possession on time. This suggests that RR Buildtech may have faced challenges in completing projects to schedule, which is a critical factor to consider in the real estate sector. The common trigger for litigation in these instances was the builder’s failure to perform on their promise of timely delivery, which is a fundamental expectation in any property purchase.
The builder lost these cases primarily due to their lack of response and failure to provide adequate evidence to support their position. When a builder fails to participate in legal proceedings, it typically indicates a weakness in their defense or an admission of guilt by omission. In these cases, the builder’s silence resulted in a default judgment against them, leading to the ordered compensation, which underscores the importance of proactive communication and compliance in legal matters.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GC No. 0180/2021 | Punjab | Complainant sought interest for delay in possessi… | ["Delay in possessi… | {"appellant_claim": "Complainant claimed delay in… | Sanjay Sharma | RR Buildtech | https://rera.punjab.gov.in/rera/rwdataOrdersJudgements\2022\M2425\/20220211FormM_OJbyAuthd4465993-d237-4fe2-a991-75877dbe94f3.pdf |
| 0179/2021 | Punjab | Complainant sought interest for delay in possessi… | ["Delay in possessi… | {"appellant_claim": "Complainant claimed delay in… | Inder Shekhar Sharma | RR Buildtech | https://rera.punjab.gov.in/rera/rwdataOrdersJudgements\2022\M2424\/20220211FormM_OJbyAuthf591cec4-c55f-458b-8864-76585610ec24.pdf |