| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
When it comes to real estate investments, potential buyers must carefully evaluate builders to ensure they are making a sound decision. In this blog post, we’ll discuss the R.R. Corporation Partnership Firm, focusing on their legal track record and what it means for prospective homebuyers.
Builder Overview
Name: R.R. Corporation Partnership Firm
States with Projects: Gujarat
Number of Complaints: 1
Cases Won: 1
Cases Lost: 0
Legal Case Details
Though R.R. Corporation has a solid record with no losses in cases brought against them, an examination of a recent case sheds light on their legal standing.
Summary of Legal Case
The sole case filed against R.R. Corporation highlighted a significant issue regarding their compliance with the RERA Act.
- Appellant’s Claim: The appellant argued that the builder had violated the RERA Act by booking and selling inventory before obtaining the necessary project registration.
- Respondent's Claim: R.R. Corporation contended that their …
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, R.R. Corporation Partnership Firm, which the builder won, revealed the following information. This report brings forth key themes observed in the disputes that emerged in recent legal proceedings. The primary themes identified were Regulatory Compliance Disputes and Claims of Penalties and Fines.
In the realm of Regulatory Compliance Disputes, one case highlighted concerns regarding the violation of the RERA Act. Opposing parties alleged that the builder had sold inventory prior to obtaining the necessary project registration, raising questions about adherence to legal protocols. On the defense, R.R. Corporation asserted that no willful violation occurred and was exempted from penalties, demonstrating adherence to regulatory frameworks where appropriate.
The claims leading to these cases primarily stemmed from buyers contesting penalties associated with alleged regulatory breaches. In this particular case, a fine of 10% of the estimated project cost was levied, indicating that disputes …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!