No Logo Available

R.R. D. HEIGHTS AND BUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED

5.0/5 (11 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Maharashtra
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the ever-evolving real estate market, potential buyers need to assess builders not only by the quality of their projects but also by their legal standing. In this post, we delve into the track record of R.R. D. Heights and Builders Private Limited, focusing on their legal history and implications for prospective buyers in Maharashtra.

Builder Overview

R.R. D. Heights and Builders Private Limited is a builder operating exclusively in Maharashtra. While they have garnered a substantial presence in the local market, their legal history presents a narrative that prospective customers should consider seriously.

Legal Analysis

R.R. D. Heights and Builders has faced 11 complaints, all of which have been won. However, notably, the builder has a concerning record of losing every single legal case brought against them. Here are some significant insights from these cases:

Patterns in Lost Cases

  • Claims of Allottee Status: In nearly …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Claims of Allottee Status Dispute Between Partners Lack of Consideration Payments Memorandum of Understanding Conflicts

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, which the builder won, revealed the following information.

A majority of the disputes revolved around claims of allottee status, with appellants asserting their rights as allottee buyers demanding the execution of registered agreements for sale. However, the builder successfully argued that many of these appellants were not genuine home buyers, instead, the disputes often emerged from conflicts between partners of a firm or company.

The primary themes identified encompass various claims, notably the assertion of allottee status and accompanying demands for contractual agreements. The claims often hinged on misunderstandings regarding the nature of the Memorandum of Understanding, which the builder contended was not a binding sales contract but a settlement instrument between partners.

The reasons these cases reached the courts typically involved contesting the builder's non-compliance regarding registered agreements or payment claims. Buyers frequently argued that the builder had failed to …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review