CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
In the dynamic real estate sector, the reputation of builders plays a crucial role in influencing buyer decisions. In this article, we delve into the performance of RR Enterprises, a builder operating in Gujarat and Karnataka, based on legal case outcomes and complaint summaries.
RR Enterprises has faced a total of four complaints in recent years, all of which have resulted in losses for the builder, indicating a concerning trend. Despite the high number of complaints, there are notable nuances in the legal cases that emerged against them, reflecting certain patterns worth exploring.
To gain a better understanding of RR Enterprises' legal standing, we break down the outcomes of the cases filed against them:
The common theme in the lost cases against RR Enterprises includes:
Interestingly, however, RR Enterprises has had some success in defending against specific claims:
Overall, RR Enterprises presents a mixed bag of performance. The four complaints leading to losses raise significant red flags for potential buyers, particularly regarding delays and financial management. While the builder has been able to defend against some claims, the consistent trend of losing cases portrays an unfavorable image that potential purchasers should carefully consider.
If you’re contemplating purchasing from RR Enterprises, here are a few recommendations:
When selecting a builder, potential buyers should also consider:
In summary, due diligence is paramount when deciding to invest in real estate, and understanding a builder's legal track record is a critical aspect of this process.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against RR Enterprises, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key issues in their legal disputes.
The cases against RR Enterprises can be broadly categorized into four types: Delayed Possession Claims, Non-compliance with RERA, Project Delay Penalties, and Refund Disputes. The majority of the claims were related to delayed possession, where buyers sought interest on the delay period, registration of flats, and complete possession including interior works. In each case, the builder attributed the delays to a lack of funds, which indicates a possible systemic issue in project management and financial planning.
Non-compliance with the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) was also a significant theme. Buyers claimed that the builder failed to display the required RERA registration number and website in their advertisements. Although the builder contested this by citing a defect in the advertising hoarding, the authority ruled against them, emphasizing the importance of adhering to RERA guidelines.
Project Delay Penalties and Refund Disputes were also critical points of contention. Buyers sought penalties for the delays and refunds due to failed projects. The builder's defense often revolved around their financial limitations and attempts to fulfill agreements, yet they were ultimately unable to meet the obligations, leading to legal consequences.
A pattern emerges from these summaries: the common triggers for litigation involve either delays in possession, non-compliance with regulatory requirements, or financial disputes regarding project delivery. The builder’s repeated losses in these cases highlight ongoing issues such as insufficient financial resources and a lack of adherence to legal standards.
The underlying reasons for the builder's losses include:
Overall, this analysis paints a picture of a builder facing significant operational and legal challenges, which potential buyers should consider seriously when contemplating a purchase from RR Enterprises.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMP/210327/0007843 | Karnataka | Complainant seeks refund with interest for failed… | ["Real estate refun… | {"appellant_claim": "Complainant seeks refund wit… | RR Enterprises | https://rera.karnataka.gov.in/reraDocument?DOC=3210640 | |
CMP/220615/0009638 | Karnataka | Complainants sought relief for interest on delay … | ["Delay in possessi… | {"appellant_claim": "Complainants claimed interes… | Smt. Prathibha A | RR Enterprises | https://rera.karnataka.gov.in/reraDocument?DOC=3210623 |
182/2019 | Gujarat | The promoter-developer of the 'White Pearl' proje… | ["RERA registration… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Gujarat Real Estate… | RR Enterprises | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1NPibo8y-K7vXiDKSf-pv0Vpi68m9FP4A |