CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the realm of real estate, buyer protection is paramount. With myriad builders in the market, understanding their track record can be crucial for potential buyers. This post delves into R.R. Partners by Developers, a builder currently operating in Madhya Pradesh, analyzing their legal disputes and offering insights for prospective buyers.
Legal Challenges Faced by R.R. Partners by Developers
Overview of Complaints
R.R. Partners by Developers has faced a total of one complaint, with a reported case lost. The legal journey highlights critical concerns regarding possession and refunds which potential buyers must consider.
Details of the Case
The only case involving R.R. Partners by Developers illustrates a troubling scenario:
- Appellant Claim: The applicant accused the builder of failing to provide possession of their flat and not refunding an advance payment of Rs. 6,00,000.
- Respondent Claim: The builder contended that the possession was withheld due to the applicant not paying …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against R.R. Partners, which the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases primarily revolve around two critical issues: delayed possession claims and disputes over payment and refunds.
The delayed possession claims predominantly arise from situations where buyers allege that the builder failed to provide timely possession of their flats. In the sole case summarized, the applicant claimed that after paying an advance of Rs. 6,00,000, they were not provided with the promised property, nor did they receive a refund. This indicates a breach of contract and a loss of trust in the builder's ability to deliver on their promises.
Disputes over payment and refunds often intersect with possession claims, as buyers who do not receive their property may also dispute the builder's retention of their payments. In the case outlined, the builder's defense was that the applicant had not paid the …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!