CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the Indian real estate market, choosing the right builder is crucial for the success of a property investment. One builder that has come under scrutiny is R.R.ENTERPRISE, which has faced numerous complaints and legal challenges. In this blog, we will analyze R.R.ENTERPRISE based on available legal case data, complaints, and outcomes, providing potential buyers with an informed perspective on what to consider before making a purchase.
Overview of Legal History
R.R.ENTERPRISE has recorded 21 cases lost with 0 cases won and a total of 21 complaints. The builder operates primarily in Maharashtra and Karnataka, two states with vibrant real estate markets. The absence of any successful defenses in court raises significant concerns about the builder’s practices and reliability.
Patterns in Legal Outcomes
Cases Won
Interestingly, the data indicates a misunderstanding regarding the classification of cases won. R.R.ENTERPRISE technically lost all cases, but numerous cases involved them …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against R.R. ENTERPRISE, which the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into three types: Delayed Possession Claims, Third-Party Interests Disputes, and Project Completion and Handover Issues.
The majority of the cases revolve around the builder's attempts to create third-party interests in flats purchased by the appellants. In these cases, the builder claimed that the second registration of the project was valid and that the appellants had no locus to lay claim against them. However, the tribunal consistently granted injunctions, restraining the builder from creating such interests, indicating a legal recognition of the appellants' rights as purchasers.
Another significant theme involves Delayed Possession Claims, where the complainants asserted that they had paid substantial amounts for apartments that were never completed or handed over. The builder's defense often revolved around claims of encroachment by …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!