No Logo Available

RTECH HOUSING PRIVATE LIMITED

5.0/5 (2 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Rajasthan
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

Rtech Housing Private Limited, a real estate developer, operates primarily in Rajasthan. Like many builders in the industry, they have faced scrutiny and legal challenges from customers. In this blog post, we will explore Rtech Housing’s legal history, focusing on the nature of the complaints filed against them, the outcomes of those cases, and what potential buyers should consider before making a purchase.

Legal Record Overview

Rtech Housing has encountered a total of two complaints, both of which resulted in favorable verdicts for the complainants. The builder won two cases and lost two others—all related to disputes regarding project completion and possession rights.

Summary of Complaints

  1. First Case: The complaint involved issues surrounding the possession of a flat. The complainant argued that Rtech Housing was coercing them to take possession of their flat without the project being fully completed and without a valid occupancy certificate. The builder contended that …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Occupancy Certificate Issues Completion of Project Phasing Refund vs. Possession Disputes

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Rtech Housing Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed several recurring themes in the disputes and resolutions. These themes provide valuable insights into the nature of the legal challenges faced by Rtech and highlight the underlying issues often seen in the real estate sector.

The primary disputes can be categorized into the following themes:

  • Delayed Possession Claims: Several cases revolve around complaints regarding delays in taking possession of flats, often accompanied by claims that the projects were incomplete.
  • Occupancy Certificate Issues: Opposing parties frequently claimed that builders were not providing the necessary occupancy certificates required for legal possession.
  • Completion of Project Phasing: Instances where builders completed projects in phases led to disputes about the readiness of certain flats for possession.
  • Refund vs. Possession Disputes: Complaints often included discussions about whether buyers …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review