No Logo Available

R.V. NIRMATA PRIVATE LIMITED

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Himachal Pradesh
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

Purchasing a property is a significant decision, and selecting the right builder can make all the difference in ensuring a smooth and satisfactory experience. In this post, we will examine R.V. Nirmata Private Limited, a builder with projects primarily in Himachal Pradesh. We will delve into their legal performance, discuss any patterns in their cases, and offer advice for potential buyers.

Builder Overview

Builder Name: R.V. Nirmata Private Limited
Number of Complaints: 1
Cases Won: 0
Cases Lost: 1
States with Projects: Himachal Pradesh

Legal Case Details

R.V. Nirmata Private Limited has been involved in at least one legal dispute, which provides insight into their operational practices:

1. Details of the Case Filed Against the Builder:
- Appellant Claim: The complainant alleged that the builder constructed flats in the stilt parking area/basement of Block-A without prior notice or permission. Furthermore, the builder failed to provide amenities as advertised.

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Amenities Not Provided Construction Without Permission Failure to Obtain Necessary Certificates

Analysis of the cases filed against R.V. Nirmata Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the complaints raised by the other parties involved. The cases highlight key areas of dispute, notably revolving around the builder's obligations regarding project amenities, construction practices, and regulatory compliance.

One of the most prominent themes is the "Amenities Not Provided." In this case, the complainant claimed that the builder had failed to deliver promised amenities, specifically individual electricity connections, which are fundamental for homebuyers. This theme is critical as it reflects a broader pattern of dissatisfaction among buyers when developers do not meet their commitments.

Another significant theme is "Construction Without Permission." The builder was accused of constructing flats in the stilt parking area/basement of Block-A without prior notice or permission. This raises important questions regarding the builder's adherence to regulatory frameworks and the potential risks buyers face when engaging with …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review