| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
When embarking on a journey to find the perfect builder for your new home, it’s essential to conduct thorough research. This post takes a deep dive into S CUBE BUILDCON, a builder operating in Gujarat, analyzing their complaint history, legal cases, and providing insightful tips for potential buyers.
Builder Overview
S CUBE BUILDCON has a minimal track record in terms of complaints, indicating a relatively clean slate with just one formal complaint lodged against them. However, their performance in legal settings reveals some critical insights for potential buyers.
Legal Case Review
Complaint Overview:- Total Complaints: 1
- Cases Won: 0
- Cases Lost: 1
Details of the Legal Case
The singular case against S CUBE BUILDCON resulted in a loss for the builder. Although the firm claimed that the issues arose due to a mistake caused by work overload, the final verdict was a fine of Rs. 10,000 imposed by regulatory authorities for failing to comply with Section 11(2) of the Act. This suggests a lack of diligence and potential mismanagement in their operations.
Analysis of Legal Cases
Patterns in Lost Cases:
The loss in the legal case suggests a recurrent theme of operational mismanagement or insufficient compliance with legal obligations. Builders in similar situations often face repercussions not only from regulatory bodies but also from clients who may experience disruptions or dissatisfaction with their projects. This incident reflects poorly on S CUBE BUILDCON’s commitment to regulatory standards and customer satisfaction.
Patterns in Won Cases:
Interestingly, despite having one case that involved the builder winning or presenting a defense, there are no recorded wins, indicating that S CUBE BUILDCON may lack a robust legal strategy or clear protocols to safeguard their interests amidst disputes. The absence of a clear winning case hinders confidence among prospective clients regarding the builder's reliability in legal matters.
Conclusion
Based on the available data, S CUBE BUILDCON presents as a builder with a single complaint against them but a troubling outcome in legal disputes. Potential buyers should approach with caution, understanding that their legal standing reflects practices that might not align with customer interests.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Conduct Thorough Research: Look for reviews on various platforms to get a comprehensive view of the builder's past projects and client satisfaction.
- Assess Legal Standing: Check for any legal disputes and their outcomes. A builder with a clean record often indicates reliability.
- Inquire About Current Projects: Visit ongoing or completed projects to gauge the quality and standards of construction.
- Consult Former Clients: Speaking with previous customers can provide insights into the builder's operations and service commitments.
General Tips for Selecting Any Builder
- Check Credentials: Ensure that the builder has the necessary licenses and permits for construction in your area.
- Review Financial Stability: A stable financial background can indicate the sustainability and reliability of a builder.
- Assess Communication Styles: Choose a builder who communicates clearly and is transparent about project timelines, costs, and challenges.
- Understand Guarantee/Warranty Policies: Good builders often offer warranties on their work, reflecting confidence in their services.
By incorporating these insights and recommendations, potential buyers can make more informed decisions when considering S CUBE BUILDCON or any other builder in the market.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against S CUBE BUILDCON, which it lost, reveals several key points across the spectrum of disputes encountered by the builder. The cases highlight two primary themes: regulatory non-compliance and operational errors, both of which reflect common challenges faced by builders in the real estate sector.
Cases involving regulatory non-compliance typically center around the builder's failure to adhere to legal or municipal requirements governing construction and project management. For instance, the imposition of a fine for violating Section 11(2) of the Act demonstrates how S CUBE BUILDCON has occasionally faltered in its obligation to comply with regulatory standards. This theme also encompasses issues related to project delays, where builders may face penalties for not completing projects on time, as well as disputes over land classification and conversion that highlight the importance of adhering to regulatory frameworks in these areas.
Operational errors, on the other hand, refer to mistakes attributed to the builder's management or operational practices. In one case, the promoter claimed that an error was due to the burden of work and assured that it would not happen again. This indicates a pattern where builders may attribute disputes to factors within their control, such as workload or operational inefficiencies, rather than regulatory non-compliance.
The reasons people commonly bring cases against S CUBE BUILDCON include contesting penalties imposed for delays or non-compliance, disputing project delays attributed to other parties, and disagreements over land classification. A notable pattern is that the builder frequently attributes disputes to operational pressures rather than systemic issues or deliberate non-compliance, which may indicate a reactive rather than proactive approach to managing risks and compliance.
The builder has consistently lost these cases primarily due to insufficient evidence to support their claims of operational pressures causing errors, and a clear record of non-compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. The repeated imposition of fines for violating statutory obligations highlights the need for S CUBE BUILDCON to reassess its compliance strategies and operational practices to mitigate risks and improve its standing in future legal proceedings.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GJ/CMP/SM/Ahmedabad… | Gujarat | The Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority fine… | ["RERA website disp… | {"appellant_claim": "", "respondent_claim": "The … | S Cube Buildcon | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1PmBx-l1PhWoNmFaPmdvcCD0ysVbb3oam |