| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Understanding S & M DEVELOPERS: A Comprehensive Overview
Introduction
In the world of real estate, selecting the right builder can significantly impact your investment. Today, we delve into one such builder, S & M DEVELOPERS, to assess their track record and provide insights for potential buyers.
Company Overview
S & M DEVELOPERS is primarily engaged in the construction business in Haryana. While their project footprint appears limited to one state, their reputation is essential for prospective homeowners and investors alike.
Legal Standing
S & M DEVELOPERS has a mixed record in legal disputes:
- Number of Complaints: 1
- Cases Won: 0
- Cases Lost: 1
Legal Case Details
The single legal case against S & M DEVELOPERS involved the following claims:
- Appellant Claim: The Authority alleged that the builder opened a new bank account without prior permission.
- Respondent Claim: S & M DEVELOPERS contended that the bank account details were mistakenly provided and claimed that no sales had been conducted from said account.
- Final Verdict: The case concluded with the imposition of a penalty amounting to Rs. 50,000, which was duly paid by the builder.
Patterns in Legal Outcomes
The provided data reveals notable patterns in the builder's legal outcomes:
- Cases Lost: S & M DEVELOPERS has not prevailed in any of the cases it faced. The outcome of the single case was a penalty, which reflects a level of scrutiny regarding its business practices.
- Cases Won: Conversely, although there was one case filed against the builder that appeared to contest their actions about account management, they ended up incurring a penalty. This points to potential difficulties in accommodating regulatory practices or administrative errors on their part.
Conclusion: Overall Assessment of S & M DEVELOPERS
Based on the available data, S & M DEVELOPERS has faced challenges in its legal dealings. With one complaint and a lost case resulting in penalties, potential buyers should approach with caution. Despite operating in a single state, it's essential for consumers to weigh the builder's legal track record along with their stability in the marketplace.
Tips for Potential Buyers
For those considering purchasing a property from S & M DEVELOPERS, the following tips are advisable:
- Research Thoroughly: Look into reviews and past projects completed by the builder to understand their quality and buyer feedback.
- Consult Legal Experts: Before engaging in any agreements, seek professional advice, especially if there are legal considerations.
- Request Transparency: Ensure that the builder provides clear documentation about their projects and any affiliated bank details.
- Understand Your Rights: Familiarize yourself with consumer rights in real estate purchases in Haryana to protect your investments.
General Tips for Choosing a Builder
In addition to specific advice related to S & M DEVELOPERS, here are broader considerations when selecting any builder:
- Verify Credentials: Ensure the builder is registered and has necessary permissions to operate in your area.
- Evaluate Portfolio: Assess the quality and style of past projects to see if they align with your expectations.
- Check Financial Stability: Look into whether the builder has faced significant financial issues that could affect the projects under development.
- Build Communication: Having direct communication lines can prevent misunderstandings and facilitate smooth transactions.
In conclusion, while S & M DEVELOPERS may offer particular projects in Haryana, it is crucial for potential buyers to exercise due diligence. With the risks of legal entanglements, ensuring every investment is protected is paramount.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against S & M DEVELOPERS, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases highlight two primary areas of concern: regulatory non-compliance and financial mismanagement.
In terms of regulatory non-compliance, the builder faced penalties due to actions that contradicted established rules. For instance, the builder opened a new bank account without permission, which led to a penalty of Rs. 50,000. This incident reflects a broader pattern of non-compliance, which may indicate a lack of due diligence on the part of the builder regarding the regulatory framework surrounding real estate transactions.
The theme of financial mismanagement is also prominent. The builder's defense in one case involved claims of mistaken bank account details and a lack of sales at the time of the incident. This scenario raises questions about the builder's financial management practices, particularly concerning transparency and accountability in financial dealings.
Common reasons for litigation in these cases include contesting penalties imposed for non-compliance and disputes over financial transactions. The builder's frequent attribution of errors to misunderstanding or mistake suggests a systemic issue with training or operational protocols that could be a recurring trigger for legal disputes.
The builder's losses in these cases can primarily be attributed to insufficient evidence to support their claims. In the reported case, the builder's defense did not convince the authorities, leading to a penalty. This outcome indicates a possible lack of substantiating documentation or a failure to adhere to legal requirements, reaffirming the importance of compliance in the real estate sector.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2239 of 2023 | Haryana | The respondent, S&M Developers, was found to have… | ["Real Estate", "RE… | {"appellant_claim": "The Authority claimed that t… | Haryana Real Estate… | S&M Developers | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/MTc4MDI1 |