| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Understanding S R Construction: Insights and Buyer Considerations
When it comes to choosing a builder, it’s essential to delve into their track record to ensure a safe and sound investment. In this post, we’ll explore S R Construction, a builder based in Karnataka, analyzing their legal history and offering insights for potential buyers.
Builder Overview
S R Construction is a builder with a solid operational footprint in Karnataka. With only one recorded complaint against them, their reputation in the market appears relatively stable. However, understanding the nature of this complaint offers valuable insights.
Legal Case Review
Cases Lost
- Number of Cases Lost: 1
- Details of the Lost Case:
- Claim: Refund with interest for the project Mana Foliage
- Verdict: Complaint dismissed for non-prosecution.
While S R Construction faced only one legal challenge that resulted in a loss, it’s crucial to observe the circumstances surrounding this case. The dismissal due to non-prosecution …
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, S R CONSTRUCTION, which the builder won, revealed the following information.
The cases can be grouped into several recurring themes. One major category involves 'Delayed Possession Claims', where customers typically seek remedies for late handovers of projects. 'Refund and Interest Disputes' emerges as another common theme, indicating that buyers are often dissatisfied with their investments, seeking financial restitution along with interest for their delays. Finally, 'Regulatory Compliance' is significant, with disputes arising from potential violations of municipal orders or classification discrepancies of land titles.
Many of these cases stem from a fundamental dissatisfaction from buyers regarding project timelines, perceived compliance, and the expectations set during initial negotiations. It is clear that buyers aimed to contest penalties imposed for delays, claim refunds for their investments, and challenge the builder's adherence to regulatory statutes. While these concerns are valid in nature, …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!