| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
In the realm of real estate, choosing a builder is a critical decision that can significantly impact your investment. One builder that has recently come into the spotlight is SAAE Infrastructure, primarily operating in Madhya Pradesh. This blog post will delve into the builder’s performance, legal issues, and insights for potential buyers.
Overview of SAAE Infrastructure
SAAE Infrastructure has garnered attention due to its project involvement and legal disputes. Presently, the company has faced a total of two complaints, both of which they have lost, raising questions about their reliability and credibility.
Legal Case Details
Cases Won
While SAAE Infrastructure is marked with two complaints, it is important to note that there are two cases where the builder faced claims related to project delays and refund issues. In these instances:
- The Jewel Project: In both cases, the applicants accused the builder of failing to complete the project and demanded refunds along with compensation for the distress caused by the undue delays.
- The final verdicts favored the applicants, leading the non-applicants (SAAE Infrastructure) to be ordered to pay back the amounts with interest and additional compensation.
This indicates a worrisome pattern—despite the builder’s claim, the complaints focus on unfulfilled contractual obligations concerning project completion and refunding payments.
Cases Lost
Analyzing the cases SAAE Infrastructure lost further underscores their challenges:
- Both cases highlighted that the builder failed to respond adequately to complaints, which may suggest a lack of communication or organization within the company.
- Factors leading to adverse judgments included the builder's inability to justify project delays and the stronger claims made by the applicants regarding the payments for incomplete work.
Patterns Observed
Common Factors in Lost Cases
- Incompletion of Projects: Both cases arose from the builder's failure to complete 'The Jewel' project, indicating potential management or operational inefficiencies.
- Consumer Claim Validity: The courts sided with the applicants, pointing to a trend of consumer claims being credible and well-documented.
Common Factors in Won Cases
Interestingly, despite losing the two cases, the builder faced ongoing litigation before an adjudicating body:
- Summary of Respondent Claims: In each instance, SAAE Infrastructure claimed that unforeseen circumstances led to the projects' incomplete status and thus shielded them from refunds. This defense was insufficient to sway the courts, suggesting a possible internal flaw in project risk management.
- Lack of Response: A critical failure on their part was a clear lack of adequate response to grievances. The absence of proper communication has likely contributed to their legal losses.
Conclusion
SAAE Infrastructure’s track record of complaints and legal losses paints a concerning picture for potential buyers. Their inability to complete projects and disregard for client communication raises red flags.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Research Thoroughly: Before engaging with SAAE Infrastructure, look for customer reviews and other consumer feedback to gauge their reliability.
- Legal Checks: Consider seeking legal advice to understand your rights and protections before signing any contracts with the builder.
General Tips for Selecting Any Builder
- Review Previous Projects: Always assess past projects of the builder to determine their reputation and quality of work.
- Get Everything in Writing: Ensure that all promises made by the builder are included in the written contract.
- Plan for Contingencies: Be prepared for delays or issues by setting up communication lines with your builder and knowing your legal options.
Ultimately, making an informed decision requires careful consideration and diligence. The case of SAAE Infrastructure serves as a crucial reminder of the importance of due diligence in the home-buying process.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against SAAE Infrastructure, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key patterns in the disputes. The cases primarily revolve around two main topics: project completion and refund disputes, as well as the compensation sought for mental and physical torture due to incomplete projects.
The first type of dispute involves claims made by buyers who paid significant amounts of money for properties in projects that were never completed. For instance, in the project 'The Jewel,' buyers claimed that after paying advances of Rs. 2,04,000 or even larger amounts like Rs. 9,00,000 for a shop, there was no progress on the project and their money was not refunded. This indicates a serious breach of contract and a loss of trust in the builder's ability to deliver properties on time.
Common reasons for bringing these cases to court include the pain points of delayed possession, the financial strain of unrecovered advances, and the emotional distress caused by the builder’s failure to meet contractual obligations. Buyers often found themselves in a precarious financial situation, having invested heavily in projects that were supposed to yield returns or serve as meaningful investments, only to find themselves with nothing but debt and disappointment.
The builder's defense in these cases typically hinged on claims of unforeseen circumstances that halted project completion. However, this defense did not resonate with the courts, as evidenced by the builder's losses in these cases. The insufficient evidence provided to support the builder's claims, coupled with a lack of transparency regarding project timelines and expectations, likely contributed to the legal outcomes.
The recurring theme of compensation for mental and physical torture suggests that the emotional and psychological impact of these financial mishandlings was significant. Courts recognized non-refundable advances not only as financial losses but also as contributors to claimants’ emotional distress. Hence, the verdicts generally included provisions for compensation in acknowledgment of the sufferers’ ordeals.
In summary, the cases against SAAE Infrastructure highlight critical issues in project management, transparency, and accountability. Buyers should take heed of these legal battles when contemplating property investments and conduct thorough due diligence on builders' track records to mitigate risks.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-87-24-0328/0328 | Madhya Pradesh | The applicant, Smt. Surbhi Bairagi, filed a compl… | ["Non-refund of amo… | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that s… | Smt. Surbhi Bairagi | SAAE Infrastructure | https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/655544725655.pdf |
| 4-87-24-0327/0327 | Madhya Pradesh | The applicant, Shri Rahul Bairagi, filed a compla… | ["Non-completion of… | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t… | Shri Rahul Bairagi | SAAE Infrastructure | https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/865766676617.pdf |