CIN | U70101TN2007PTC063682 |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | 29, THIRUMALAI PILLAI ROAD, T.NAGAR , CHENNAI, Tamil Nadu, India - 600017 |
Company Status | Private |
Overall Case Outcomes
In the competitive real estate market, choosing the right builder can significantly impact your investment and quality of life. This article delves into Sabari Realtors Private Limited, examining their legal challenges and the implications these might have for potential buyers.
Sabari Realtors operates primarily in Tamil Nadu and has been involved in a total of two legal complaints. Unfortunately for the builder, it has lost both cases brought against it, raising concerns about its reliability and adherence to contractual obligations.
When analyzing the legal battles faced by Sabari Realtors, we find the following:
Both complaints against Sabari Realtors highlight a recurring theme of incomplete construction and failure to deliver possession to customers, which suggests a trend of project delays or mismanagement. Such issues can lead to frustration for buyers who expect timely delivery and fulfillment of contractual obligations.
Interestingly, both cases demonstrate the builder's defense strategy, focusing on counterclaims regarding payment disputes and structural completion. However, the outcomes did not favor the builder, indicating weaknesses in their operational compliance and project management.
Overall, Sabari Realtors presents a concerning picture based on the available data. With two complaints filed against them—resulting in losses—there appears to be a pattern of not meeting customer expectations regarding project completion and handover timelines. Potential buyers should approach with caution, considering the risk of similar experiences.
If you are considering a purchase from Sabari Realtors or any builder, keep these tips in mind:
When selecting any builder, consider the following general tips:
Sabari Realtors Private Limited faces significant challenges as highlighted by their legal history. Potential buyers should remain diligent in their research and cautious in their dealings. Remember, the right builder can make a world of difference in your property investment, ensuring that your dream home becomes a reality rather than a source of stress.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against Sabari Realtors Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into the common themes and disputes faced by the builder. The cases highlight two primary recurring themes: Delayed Possession Claims and Non-compliance with Orders.
The Delayed Possession Claims theme encompasses the majority of the disputes filed against the builder. In these cases, the complainants primarily claimed that the builder had failed to complete the construction of their flats and did not hand over possession, despite having received the sale consideration. This indicates a pattern where buyers were left waiting for their properties, leading to dissatisfaction and legal recourse. The builder's defense often revolved around claims of structural completion and the buyer's alleged non-payment, which suggests a systemic issue in communication or accountability regarding project timelines and payments.
The Non-compliance with Orders theme is highlighted by the builder's failure to adhere to previous rulings by regulatory authorities. In one significant case, the Execution Petitioner claimed that the builder had not complied with orders passed on 04.09.2019, which reflects a concerning trend where the builder did not prioritize legal obligations. The builder's response in this instance indicated a reliance on external factors, such as a Resolution Plan submitted to the NCLT, which might imply an attempt to circumvent direct responsibility for compliance.
Common reasons for the cases reaching the court include contesting delays, disputing project completions, and the builder’s non-compliance with regulatory requirements. Buyers were primarily motivated by the frustration of delayed possession, while the builder's litigation often stemmed from a position of denial regarding their obligations and timelines.
The builder lost these cases chiefly due to insufficient evidence supporting their claims of completion and compliance. There were also instances where the builder failed to follow interim directions, leading to further legal consequences. A notable pattern was the builder's misunderstanding or miscommunication regarding project timelines and handover dates, which highlights potential systemic issues in their operational practices.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!