| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the realm of residential and commercial development, the credibility of a builder is often gauged through their history of complaints and legal outcomes. SAI ENTERPRISES, operating within Chhattisgarh and Maharashtra, presents an interesting case study with a record of complaints and legal proceedings. This blog post examines the builder's performance based on complaints, cases won, and cases lost, providing valuable insights for potential buyers.
Overview of Legal Performance
SAI ENTERPRISES has encountered a total of 11 complaints, which indicates a notable level of scrutiny within its operations. Analyzing the legal outcomes shows that the builder has successfully won 6 cases while losing 5. This balance of victories and losses suggests a builder that faces challenges in compliance and legal disputes but also demonstrates capabilities in defending its interests.
Cases Lost
The analysis of the 5 cases that SAI ENTERPRISES lost reveals a pattern consisting of:
- Repetitive Claims: …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against SAI Enterprises, where the builder lost, reveals several key insights across the disputes raised. The cases can be broadly categorized into two themes: compliance with regulatory disclosures and procedural disputes, including absenteeism.
In terms of regulatory compliance, the most notable claim involved the builder's failure to provide quarterly updates and other necessary disclosures as mandated by the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act. This highlights an important area of concern for potential buyers regarding SAI Enterprises' adherence to regulatory requirements. Non-compliance with such rules can lead to terminated proceedings, as seen in this case, where the appellant was able to complete the required updates and compliances, reflecting a pattern where builders may face legal challenges due to insufficient fulfillment of their obligations.
The second theme involves procedural disputes, particularly cases that were dismissed due to the absence of the appealing party. While specific claims …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed by the builder SAI ENTERPRISES, which it lost, revealed critical insights into the nature of their legal challenges. The cases primarily focused on the issues surrounding the recording of submissions and legal procedural disputes.
The ongoing theme in these cases pertains to the builder's insistence on the need to document additional submissions and arguments that they believed were critical to their position. The builder repeatedly sought to have the arguments introduced and recognized in court that they had submitted on various occasions, dating back to written submissions made in January and March 2022.
However, the consistent response from the opposing party was that the necessary submissions and arguments had already been adequately recorded. This indicates a possible disconnect or misunderstanding on the part of the builder regarding the proceedings and documentation processes.
A recurring pattern in these cases is the builder's propensity to contest …
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, which it won, revealed the following information. The cases primarily centered around topics related to compliance with pre-deposit orders, claims for withdrawal of deposited amounts, amendments in appeal memos, and extension requests for compliance. Each of these themes highlights the builder's attempts to navigate legal complexities and regulatory requirements efficiently.
Within the theme of compliance with pre-deposit orders, SAI ENTERPRISES frequently sought and was granted opportunities to comply with legal requirements, illustrating the builder's proactive approach to adhering to legal frameworks. The cases regarding claims for withdrawal of deposited amounts reflect the builder's strategic use of financial resources in legal proceedings, showing an understanding of the financial implications of real estate regulations.
When examining the amendments in appeal memos, it appears that SAI ENTERPRISES emphasized jurisdictional correctness, indicating a strategic focus on ensuring that legal processes were followed correctly. The extension …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!