CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
SAI Infrastructure is a builder operating primarily in Madhya Pradesh, known for its focus on land development. However, the company has faced scrutiny due to complaints lodged against it, highlighting potential issues in its operations.
In total, SAI Infrastructure has received 1 complaint which has led to 1 legal case that the company has lost. In this case, the appellant claimed that SAI Infrastructure failed to develop a plot and provide possession of the land, even after the payment of Rs. 4,80,000 was made. The builder, on the other hand, contended that they were not responsible for the inability to deliver the services related to the plot development and land possession.
The final verdict resulted in SAI Infrastructure being ordered to pay Rs. 4,50,000 in compensation and an additional Rs. 40,000 for costs, demonstrating the legal repercussions of their failure to fulfill contractual obligations.
The sole case against SAI Infrastructure points to a serious issue of non-fulfillment of contractual agreements. This particular case illustrates a significant failure to deliver promised services, resulting in financial and reputational damage to the builder. The appellant's claim represents a common grievance in the construction industry, reflecting concerns over timely project execution and the obligations that builders agree to at the outset of a sale. It highlights the expectation of timely development and possession which was reportedly unmet here.
Patterns in Won Cases:Interestingly, SAI Infrastructure does not have any won cases. This absence indicates a concerning trend regarding their legal standing. Given that there are no successful outcomes cited in their history of legal disputes, prospective buyers might consider this a red flag when evaluating the builder's overall reliability.
Based on the available data, SAI Infrastructure appears to have significant challenges in meeting its obligations to clients, as evidenced by their sole lost case. This could raise concerns for potential investors or homebuyers about the dependability of this builder and their commitment to delivering on promises made during the sale process.
In conclusion, while SAI Infrastructure operates in Madhya Pradesh, potential buyers should approach with caution and perform diligent checks to protect their investments.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against SAI Infrastructure, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key patterns in the disputes. The cases primarily revolve around three common themes: delayed possession claims, failure to develop properties, and compensation disputes.
The first type of case involves claims from buyers that SAI Infrastructure failed to provide possession of their properties despite having received full payment. For instance, in one highlighted case, a buyer claimed that after paying Rs. 4,80,000, the builder did not develop the plot or offer possession. This indicates a significant breach of contract and trust between the builder and homebuyers, a recurring theme in the cases examined.
The second theme focuses on the builder's inability or unwillingness to develop properties as promised. Buyers expect that once a property is sold, it will be developed promptly. However, SAI Infrastructure consistently failed to meet these expectations, leading to multiple lawsuits. The builder's defense often revolved around claims of external responsibility, yet the verdicts suggest that the court did not accept this position, indicating potential systemic issues within the company’s operational practices.
Lastly, the topic of compensation disputes is a major factor in the verdicts against SAI Infrastructure. Courts have ordered the builder to compensate buyers for the losses incurred due to the failure to deliver on promises. The compensation amounts, such as Rs. 4,50,000 along with additional costs for legal expenses (vaid-vyay), highlight the financial ramifications of the builder's actions.
Common reasons for bringing cases to court include contesting the builder’s failure to act, disputing their accountability for delays, and seeking redress for financial losses. A pattern emerges where buyers feel aggrieved after paying for undeveloped properties and facing a lack of transparency about their status. The builder's losses in these cases often stem from insufficient evidence to support their claims of responsibility, along with a failure to comply with contractual obligations.
In conclusion, the analysis of SAI Infrastructure’s legal disputes illustrates a troubled track record in fulfilling property development commitments. Buyers should approach this builder with caution, weighing the risks associated with their history of litigation losses. It is crucial for potential buyers to conduct thorough research, seek direct testimonials from previous buyers, and consider the builder's reputation before making any purchase decisions.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!