| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
When it comes to investing in real estate, selecting a builder with a strong reputation for reliability and quality is crucial. In this blog post, we will thoroughly analyze Sai Krishna Builders & Promoters, focusing on their complaint resolution, legal case outcomes, and overall performance in the industry.
Overview of Sai Krishna Builders & Promoters
Sai Krishna Builders & Promoters operates in Chhattisgarh and has encountered a total of five complaints. Of these, the builder has won two cases while losing three. This performance warrants a closer examination to understand the trends in their legal challenges and how potential buyers can navigate this landscape.
Legal Case Details
Cases Won by the Builder
Sai Krishna Builders & Promoters has achieved victory in two significant cases:
- Case Summary: The applicant claimed that promised facilities including roads, drainage, and electricity were not provided. The builder argued that most of the amenities were …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Sai Krishna Builders & Promoters, where the builder lost, reveals significant insights into their operational practices and legal disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into three themes: Failure to Provide Promised Facilities, Delayed Execution of Sale Deeds, and Non-Compliance with Regulatory Requirements.
The first theme, Failure to Provide Promised Facilities, encompasses two cases where the applicants claimed that the builder did not deliver the facilities promised in the project brochure. The builder's defense was that all facilities were completed except for the installation of an electric transformer and laying paver blocks, which indicates a pattern of nearing completion but failing to finalize critical aspects, potentially due to procrastination or financial constraints. This theme highlights a common reason for dissatisfaction among buyers who expect a certain level of amenities when investing in properties.
The second theme, Delayed Execution of Sale …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Sai Krishna Builders & Promoters, which it won, revealed the following information. The builder's disputes primarily relate to claims surrounding the non-compliance with facility provisions as detailed in project brochures.
The case summaries highlight several recurring themes. The most notable theme is "Non-compliance with Brochure Specifications," where buyers claim that promised facilities such as drainage, electricity, and security arrangements were not fulfilled. These cases typically reveal conflicts over what was promised in promotional materials compared to the final project delivery. Another related topic is "Incomplete Facility Provision," as many claims suggest that while some facilities were partially completed, others were either neglected or delayed. Lastly, disputes often arise over project completion dates, demonstrating contention over whether a builder met the expected timeline for provision of services.
Sai Krishna Builders & Promoters commonly brought these cases to court mainly to …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Sai Krishna Builders & Promoters, which the builder won, revealed the following information.
The disputes primarily revolved around themes such as 'Delayed Possession Claims', where buyers accused the builder of not delivering possession of properties on time.
Additionally, there were 'Incomplete Construction Disputes', wherein buyers alleged that construction was not completed despite having made full payments.
Some cases also fell into 'Payment Disputes', highlighting disagreements over the outstanding amounts needed to finish the project, while 'Construction Completion Issues' highlighted challenges around the timely finishing of homes.
Lastly, a theme which emerged was 'False Accusations Against Builders', reflecting instances where buyers may have made exaggerated claims due to misunderstanding or lack of information.
The reasons for bringing these cases to court often stemmed from disagreements over project timelines and completion status, with applicants claiming delays or non-completion despite payment.
A common pattern …
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!