CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
In the competitive real estate market of Gujarat, Sai Krupa Developers is a name that has come under scrutiny due to multiple legal complaints. With a total of four complaints lodged against them, this blog post will delve into the implications of these legal challenges, the outcomes of the cases, and offer valuable insights for potential buyers.
Sai Krupa Developers finds themselves in a challenging position, facing four complaints, all of which have resulted in lost cases. The outcomes indicate a concerning trend, as the builder has not won any of these legal battles. While the cases are categorized as complaint withdrawals by the complainants, this outcome still raises questions about the builder's standing and reputation in the market.
Given the information provided, the builder has a disconcerting record: 4 cases lost. The insights into these cases reveal a pattern where complaints were ultimately withdrawn. Although the reasons behind the withdrawals are not specified, several factors could contribute:
Interestingly, while there were no cases won outright by the builder, the case withdrawn
verdict could imply that Sai Krupa Developers managed to avoid an adverse legal determination. However, zero victories in formal legal terms might reflect a lack of legal strategy or issues with project delivery that might not have been addressed effectively.
Sai Krupa Developers's track record raises several flags for potential buyers. While the complaints are withdrawn, the complete lack of victories in any legal scenario suggests an urgent need for the builder to improve operations and customer satisfaction.
In conclusion, while Sai Krupa Developers operates within the Gujarat real estate market, potential buyers should approach with caution and thorough diligence. Making informed choices can lead to a satisfying property investment experience.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Sai Krupa Developers, which it lost, revealed several key themes across the complaints raised by the other parties involved.
The cases can be broadly categorized into types that highlight the builder's primary disputes, such as delayed possession claims, penalties for project delays, disputes over land conversion, and regulatory non-compliance. Each of these themes emerged from the summaries provided, indicating a pattern of challenges that Sai Krupa Developers faced in fulfilling its commitments and adhering to standards.
Common reasons for bringing cases to court included contesting penalties imposed for delays, disputing project delays attributed to other parties, and disagreements over land classification. For instance, many complaints revolved around the builder's failure to deliver units within the promised timelines, leading to claims of delayed possession. Similarly, there were indications of disputes related to penalties, where the builder may have contested the validity or amount of penalties imposed for delays or non-compliance.
Notably, the summaries suggest that the builder lost these cases primarily due to complaints being withdrawn by the complainants rather than a court ruling against the builder. This could imply several scenarios, such as insufficient evidence provided by the builder to defend against claims, agreements reached between parties that led to withdrawal, or simply a lack of follow-through on the complaints filed.
Regardless, the patterns emerging from these cases highlight the importance of transparency and open communication in real estate transactions, as well as the need for builders to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements and adherence to project timelines.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMP/Surat/230815/00… | Gujarat | Complaint withdrawn by complainant. Case stands d… | ["Withdrawal of com… | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c… | Kathiriya Rameshbha… | Sai Krupa Developers | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1ixZ2knkzI38xdwG1FhwW2us8HgxS0gWt |
CMP/Surat/230816/00… | Gujarat | Complaint withdrawn by complainant. Case stands d… | ["Withdrawal of com… | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c… | Patel Dharmendrakum… | Sai Krupa Developers | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1filJQzC2kgkX8I-LzoQFJEBK031JOASB |
CMP/Surat/230815/00… | Gujarat | The complaint was withdrawn by the complainant, a… | ["Withdrawal of com… | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c… | Pandya Mukeshbhai A… | Sai Krupa Developers | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1XHMRvOkTru7AA7_8w76yl1Aeic9wYY7B |
CMP/Surat/230815/00… | Gujarat | Complaint withdrawn by the complainant. Case stan… | ["Withdrawal of com… | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c… | Busa Gopalbhai Bhav… | Sai Krupa Developers | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1MkoeJ69qdKj4uv40ZcXgp0wb9ypSMGI0 |