CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
When considering a builder for a real estate investment, analyzing their track record in handling complaints and legal disputes can be crucial. In this post, we will explore Sai Nath Commercial, a builder operating in Chhattisgarh, to provide potential buyers with insights into their performance and the factors that may influence their decision.
Sai Nath Commercial has garnered a reputation in Chhattisgarh, but it is essential to assess their reliability based on available data. With only one recorded complaint and a singular legal case, their track record is relatively brief but revealing.
The builder has been involved in one legal case, which resulted in a loss for Sai Nath Commercial. The summaries from the case indicate that it was disposed of, but further details concerning the claims from both sides remain unspecified. Additionally, there is one case listed as won, although specifics about that case are also not provided. This asymmetry in the data is noteworthy and suggests a need for cautious interpretation.
Given the limited data, we can make some preliminary assessments about Sai Nath Commercial's performance:
In summary, Sai Nath Commercial's track record in legal disputes is quite limited, with one case won, one case lost, and just one recorded complaint. For potential buyers, this offers a mixed picture — while there have been few complaints overall, the loss in the legal case may cast doubt on the reliability of this builder.
If you’re considering purchasing property from Sai Nath Commercial, here are a few tips to keep in mind:
Selecting a builder requires diligence. Here are some general tips to help in your decision-making:
By taking these factors into account, you can make a more informed decision about whether Sai Nath Commercial is the right builder for your needs.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against Sai Nath Commercial, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key patterns emerging from the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into four types: delayed possession claims, non-compliance with municipal orders, disputes over land conversion or classification, and penalties for project delays.
Many of the cases involve penalties for delays, where customers or partners contested the builder's failure to complete projects on time. This points to an ongoing issue in the construction sector where timelines are often not met, leading to dissatisfaction among stakeholders. The builder was also involved in several disputes revolving around land classification and conversion, indicating a potential lack of clarity or adherence to regulatory frameworks in this area.
A common trigger for litigation was the builder's failure to fulfill commitments, which led to claims of delayed possession and unmet expectations. Stakeholders often brought cases to court to seek redress for these failures or to dispute the builder's interpretation of land classifications and project requirements.
The builder lost these cases primarily due to insufficient evidence to support their claims or defenses. Factors contributing to their losses include non-compliance with legal or regulatory requirements, failure to follow interim directions from courts or municipalities, and a lack of understanding of land or project classification rules. This underlines the importance for builders to ensure thorough legal compliance and adequate documentation in their operations.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!