SAI ROSHAN INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

Sai Roshan Infrastructure Private Limited has made its mark in the construction sector, particularly in the state of Odisha. This blog post aims to provide a detailed overview of the builder's performance based on legal case outcomes and to offer valuable insights for potential buyers.

Legal Performance Overview

Sai Roshan Infrastructure Private Limited has been involved in a total of 4 legal complaints. Impressively, the builder has managed to win all cases filed against it, with a clean record of 4 cases won and 0 cases lost. This showcases a strong standing in legal matters related to their operations.

Summary of Legal Cases

The detailed breakdown of the cases reveals that all four instances were dismissed as withdrawn. It is worth noting that a dismissal as withdrawn typically indicates that the appellant (the party filing the complaint) chose not to pursue the case further. This can sometimes reflect insufficient evidence, a change of circumstances, or an amicable resolution outside of legal proceedings.

Analysis of Patterns in Legal Cases

Cases Dismissed as Withdrawn

• Common Factor: All four cases against Sai Roshan Infrastructure were categorized as dismissed due to withdrawal by the complainant. This suggests that while there were complaints, the reasons for withdrawal were likely non-substantive with regards to the builder's practices. It could indicate that the appellant felt their claims were not strong enough to carry through, or that satisfactory resolutions were reached at an earlier stage.
• Impact on Reputation: This pattern positively impacts Sai Roshan’s reputation as potential buyers might interpret these dismissals to mean that the company operates within legal and ethical frameworks.

Won Cases

• Dominance in Legal Standing: The complete winning record reinforces the builder’s reliability and trustworthiness. It reflects the company’s strength in handling claims and their commitment to maintaining a good rapport with clients and the legal system.
• Market Perception: Such a record will likely enhance buyer confidence, encouraging potential clients to consider working with Sai Roshan Infrastructure.

Conclusion

Overall, Sai Roshan Infrastructure Private Limited appears to be a well-regarded builder in the construction market, especially in Odisha. Their ability to win all legal cases filed against them, combined with the dismissal of complaints as withdrawn, paints a positive picture for potential homeowners and investors.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Research and Verify: While the legal track record is solid, always conduct your own research regarding the builder’s past projects and customer feedback.
2. Ask for References: Speaking with past buyers can give insights into the builder's reliability and quality of work.
3. Select Quality Over Quantity: Do not just choose a builder based on their legal record, but also consider their construction quality and customer service.

General Tips When Selecting a Builder

• Review Legal History: Check a builder's history of legal disputes, not just their success rate.
• Assess Financial Stability: Make sure the builder is financially sound and can complete the projects on time.
• Inspect Previous Projects: Visit completed projects to gauge the quality of construction.
• Seek Transparency: Ensure clear communication about contracts, timelines, and project details to avoid misunderstandings in the future.

In summary, Sai Roshan Infrastructure Private Limited seems to be a builder that can be trusted, backed by their excellent legal standing and positive patterns in customer resolution.

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Sai Roshan Infrastructure Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The common themes identified from the cases indicate that many disputes revolved around the withdrawal of claims, a lack of sufficient evidence presented by the opposing parties, and issues related to legal compliance. Although the specifics of the claims from the appellants and respondents were not detailed, the overarching outcomes suggest prevalent trends in litigation against builders.

The cases brought to court seem to touch upon several recurring themes. A significant number were dismissed due to withdrawals by the opposing parties, indicating that the claims may have lacked sufficient grounding. Moreover, the absence of detailed claims points to a potential issue with inadequate evidence or understanding of legal obligations on part of the claimants, reflecting a pattern where buyers or other parties may have made accusations without a solid basis.

The builder, Sai Roshan Infrastructure Private Limited, effectively defended itself in these matters. The common reasons for their successful defense appear to include instances where the opposing parties were unable to substantiate their claims adequately, or where there was a clear misunderstanding of the legal framework, including land classification or project regulations. It seems that these withdrawals indicate a lack of confidence in the validity of the claims or perhaps a realization of misjudgments in filing the complaints.

This analysis provides valuable insight into the builder’s reputation and the complexities of the broader real estate market. It underscores the point that while legitimate disputes exist within the industry, there are also scenarios where builders face baseless accusations that could lead to unnecessary legal battles. Sai Roshan Infrastructure Private Limited's successful navigation through these legal challenges enhances its reputation in an industry often fraught with misunderstandings.

In conclusion, potential buyers should take heed of the information presented in these cases. It is crucial to make informed decisions and approach any claims against builders with careful consideration and thorough research. While there will always be a segment of disputes reflecting legitimate grievances, the case studies demonstrate that builders like Sai Roshan Infrastructure Private Limited can robustly defend themselves against unjust claims. Buyers are encouraged to seek reliable information and to critically evaluate the context of any allegations before drawing conclusions about a builder's reputation.