CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
In the competitive real estate market of Gujarat, builders must not only offer appealing projects but also maintain a solid reputation when it comes to customer satisfaction. Sai Shukan Residency, based in Gujarat, presents an intriguing case. With only one recorded complaint and a perfect track record in legal disputes, this builder may be worth exploring for potential buyers seeking quality housing solutions.
Sai Shukan Residency has successfully navigated the challenges posed by the market, evidenced by the data available. The builder has faced one complaint, which may reflect either the quality of their projects or the nature of client expectations regarding residential facilities. More notably, Sai Shukan Residency has won 100% of the cases brought against them, illustrating their ability to resolve disputes effectively.
Sai Shukan Residency's commitment to rectifying problems is demonstrated in their sole legal case won:
This outcome suggests that while Sai Shukan Residency can face challenges, they are held accountable and ordered to comply with the standards expected by homebuyers.
Sai Shukan Residency emerges as a reputable builder in Gujarat's real estate landscape. The builder's strong track record – with no cases lost and a proactive approach in legal matters – underscores their reliability. This builder appears to prioritize customer satisfaction and compliance with regulatory standards, making them a viable option for homebuyers.
In summary, Sai Shukan Residency stands out as a builder with a commendable legal record and responsive business practices, making them a contender for those seeking a home in Gujarat.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, which it won, revealed the following information.
The builder, Sai Shukan Residency, primarily dealt with disputes involving objections from allottees concerning the facilities that were allegedly not provided or were inadequate. These cases generally focused on two key themes: disputes over the amenities stated in the marketing materials and objections to the acceptance of possession of common area facilities. The claims made by the allottees often emphasized that certain promised features, such as a clubhouse and gym, were either not delivered or were defective, while the builder defended its position by asserting that all amenities were delivered according to the brochure, and that the allottees were refusal to accept possession of common areas contributed to the disputes.
Upon closer examination, the reasons the builder commonly brought these issues to the court can be attributed to the need to contest wrongful claims of facility deficiencies as well as objections regarding possession. Patterns have emerged showcasing instances where allegations stemmed from misunderstandings or expectations that exceeded what was legally or contractually obligated. The builder's litigation mostly pertained to ensuring its rights were upheld against allegations that it believed to be misleading or unfounded.
The builder's success in these cases often stemmed from the opposing party's insufficient evidential support for their claims, and at times, a failure to adhere to legal and regulatory stipulations. The builder's defenses were well-structured, leveraging clear contractual obligations and the established delivery of amenities in accordance with the initial plans. This trend of successfully defending against unjust claims positions Sai Shukan Residency as a builder that may face unjustified accusations in its operations, reflecting a broader issue within the real estate market where buyers sometimes bring forth exaggerated or erroneous claims against builders.
Potential buyers should take note of this pattern, recognizing that while there are legitimate concerns in the real estate market, builders like Sai Shukan Residency demonstrate a robustness in defending its interests against accusations that lack substantial merit. It is essential for prospective buyers to approach claims with due diligence, seek verified information, and consider the broader context when forming opinions about a builder's reputation. Being informed empowers buyers to make sound decisions in a complex real estate landscape.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!