SAI SURYA DEVELOPERS

CIN	Not Available
Year Established	Not Available
Address	Not Available
Company Status	Not Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

Purchasing a home or plot of land is often one of the most significant investments in a person’s life. It's essential to have all the information available before making such a critical decision. In this blog post, we delve into the case of SAI SURYA DEVELOPERS, a builder operating in Telangana, to understand their track record and what potential buyers should consider.

Builder Overview

Name: SAI SURYA DEVELOPERS
Number of Complaints: 9
Cases Won: 0
Cases Lost: 9
States with Projects: Telangana

From the data provided, it is evident that SAI SURYA DEVELOPERS has encountered numerous legal challenges, with a total of nine cases filed against them, all of which they lost. This paints a concerning picture for anyone considering investing in properties developed by them.

Analysis of Legal Cases

Common Factors in Cases Lost

Failure to Register Property: A recurring theme in the complaints is the builder's inability …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. Includes summaries and key takeaways.

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics

Delayed Registration and Repayment Claims "Failure to Register Property in Buyers Name" Misrepresentation and Penalties Refund Disputes Due to False Promises

Analysis of the cases filed against SAI SURYA DEVELOPERS, which the builder lost, reveals significant insights into their business practices and the recurring disputes they faced with their clients.

The cases can be broadly categorized into several themes: Delayed Registration and Repayment Claims, Failure to Register Property in Buyer's Name, Misrepresentation and Penalties, and Refund Disputes Due to False Promises.

Many of the complaints revolved around the builder's failure to register properties in the names of the buyers after full payment had been made. Buyers also frequently raised issues related to delayed repayments, asserting that amounts owed were not returned promptly or at all. The builder was often found to be misrepresenting their obligations, which led to multiple penalties imposed by the authorities.

A consistent pattern emerged where buyers would contest the builder’s claims, particularly when the builder attributed delays to buyers not having paid the full …