SAMARTH ENTERPRISES SHEVEN SHOPPERS

Introduction

When it comes to investing in real estate, choosing the right builder is paramount. Today, we spotlight Samarth Enterprises Sheven Shoppers, a builder situated in Gujarat with a mixed record in legal dealings. Let's delve into the company's reputation, past legal encounters, and what potential buyers should consider before making a commitment.

Overview of Samarth Enterprises Sheven Shoppers

Samarth Enterprises Sheven Shoppers has garnered some attention due to its unique position in the real estate market in Gujarat. With only one complaint registered against them, the public perception may seem relatively positive at first glance. However, a closer examination of the legal cases reveals a more complex picture.

Legal Case Breakdown

In reviewing the legal history of Samarth Enterprises, we find that there has been one complaint registered against them:

• Total Complaints: 1
• Cases Won: 0
• Cases Lost: 1

Details of the Lost Case

The single case that Samarth Enterprises lost revolved around violations of the Real Estate (Exchange and Development) Act, 2016. In this case, the appellant alleged that the builder failed to adequately display their RERA registration number and website in advertisements. While the builder admitted to the oversight, claiming it was an inadvertent mistake, the final verdict led to a penalty of Rs. 50,000 imposed by the authority. This loss might reflect a lack of adherence to regulatory standards, an important factor for potential buyers to consider.

Patterns in Legal Outcomes

Cases Lost

The lone case Samarth Enterprises has lost reveals a pattern of legal accountability, where compliance with regulations and transparency appears to be a concern. The builder's failure to display vital registration information indicates a potential neglect of legal obligations, which could impact buyer trust and confidence.

Cases Won

Interestingly, despite the builder having only one legal encounter, they did not win any cases. This raises questions about their legal preparedness and the potential for future disputes.

Conclusion: Overall Assessment of Samarth Enterprises Sheven Shoppers

Given the limited number of complaints and the singular loss, it can be misleading to categorize Samarth Enterprises as unreliable. However, the lost case does illuminate real areas of concern related to compliance and regulatory adherence. For potential buyers, it’s crucial to assess how this builder's legal history might reflect on future projects.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Investigate Legal History - Before finalizing any deal, take a close look at the builder’s legal history. Understand the nature of any complaints and resolutions that have arisen in the past.2. Check Compliance with RERA - Ensure that any builder you consider is fully compliant with RERA regulations. Look for clear display of registration numbers and other essential details in all advertising and documentation.3. Gather References - Talk to previous customers or seek reviews about their experience with Samarth Enterprises. This can provide invaluable insights into the builder's reliability and service.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

- Assess Reputation: Look for builders with a strong reputation in the market backed by positive reviews from homeowners.- Evaluate Quality of Work: Visit some of their completed projects to gauge the quality of construction and design.- Inquire About Financial Stability: A builder’s financial health is crucial; ensure they are stable enough to complete a project without delays or downgrades in quality.- Read the Fine Print: When signing contracts, ensure that all terms are clear and protections for your investment are included.

In summary

, while Samarth Enterprises Sheven Shoppers may have a limited track record with only one complaint, the outcomes of their legal interactions should prompt caution. By doing thorough research and due diligence, potential buyers can make informed decisions that will lead to successful homeownership.

Analysis of the cases filed against Samarth Enterprises Sheven Shoppers, where the builder lost, revealed several key points across the various disputes. The cases can be primarily grouped into two common themes: regulatory non-compliance and penalties for violations.

The builder faced legal action predominantly due to its failure to comply with the Real Estate (Exchange and Development) Act, 2016. Specifically, the builder was found to have violated Section 11(2) of the Act by not displaying their RERA registration number and website in advertisements. This highlights a pattern where builders may face legal consequences due to insufficient adherence to regulatory requirements, which raises concerns about their operational integrity and transparency.

The primary reason people brought cases against this builder was to contest the regulatory violations, which resulted in penalties. The builder's defense often revolved around claims of accidental non-compliance and assurances of future adherence, yet this did not mitigate the penalties imposed. The underlying factor contributing to the builder's losses in these cases was their inability to meet regulatory standards, demonstrating a lack of due diligence with legal obligations.

Overall, these case outcomes serve as a warning to potential buyers about Samarth Enterprises' legal standing and compliance history, suggesting a need for caution when considering their projects.