SAMAVASARAN ENTERPRISE

Introduction

In the competitive real estate market, the reputation of builders can significantly impact the decision-making process for potential homebuyers. This blog post delves into the builder Samavasaran Enterprise, analyzing its legal track record, complaints, and offering insights for potential buyers considering a project in Gujarat.

Overview of Samavasaran Enterprise

• Name: Samavasaran Enterprise
• Number of Complaints: 1
• Cases Won: 0
• Cases Lost: 1
• States with Projects: Gujarat

Legal History

Samavasaran Enterprise has a sparse legal history characterized by limited engagement in disputes, with only one complaint recorded against the builder. Reviewing the details of this case offers insights into the builder's operational conduct and interactions with clients and regulatory bodies.

Case Analysis

1. Cases Lost:
   • The builder lost one case where the final verdict resulted in a fine of Rs. 50,000 for the failure to submit the first quarterly report on time. This indicates a potential pattern of administrative oversight or regulatory compliance issues that might reflect on their operational practices.
2. Cases Won:
   • Samavasaran Enterprise has recorded no cases won, which raises concerns regarding the builder's ability to navigate legal challenges effectively.

Patterns in Legal Cases

Upon examining the legal circumstances surrounding Samavasaran Enterprise:

• Common Factor in Lost Cases:
  • The sole case lost by the builder involved a failure to meet regulatory deadlines, specifically concerning a quarterly report. This suggests a risk associated with the builder's project management and adherence to legal obligations.
• Common Factor in Won Cases:
  • There are no instances of cases won that can showcase the builder's strengths as a result of successful defense or compliance.

Conclusion

Based on the limited but revealing data on Samavasaran Enterprise, potential buyers should approach this builder with caution. The single complaint and the loss of the only case indicate possible deficiencies in administrative operations may affect project delivery and client experience.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Research Thoroughly: Before committing to any builder, check for additional reviews, ratings, and feedback from other clients to gain insights into their reliability and service.
2. Ask About Compliance: Inquire about the builder's history regarding timely compliance with regulatory requirements. A builder's ability to meet deadlines can be indicative of their reliability.
3. Visit Past Projects: If possible, visit previous projects completed by the builder to assess the quality of construction and client satisfaction.
4. Request Documentation: Ensure all contracts and agreements are clearly documented and all phases of the project are outlined well to avoid future disputes.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

• Start with Research: Investigate the builder’s reputation, experience, and previous projects. Online reviews and ratings can provide helpful insights.
• Check for Complaints: Look into any filed complaints against the builder through consumer protection agencies or local real estate forums.
• Assess Transparency: A reliable builder should be upfront and transparent about costs, timelines, and project details.
• Seek Recommendations: Talk to friends, family, or colleagues who have recently launched similar projects to recommend reputable builders.

In summary, while Samavasaran Enterprise operates in the real estate market of Gujarat, the data indicates that potential buyers should conduct thorough background research before proceeding with any commitments.

Analysis of the cases filed against Samavasaran Enterprise, where the builder lost, reveals several key insights into their legal disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into two themes: regulatory compliance issues and delay-related penalties.

The first type of cases involves regulatory compliance issues, where the builder faced challenges related to adhering to legal or municipal requirements. For instance, the case that resulted in a fine of Rs. 50,000 highlights the builder's failure to submit the first quarterly report on time, demonstrating a pattern of non-compliance that led to legal consequences.

Delay-related penalties constitute another significant theme in these cases. Although the specifics of project delays are not detailed in the summary, the fine imposed suggests that the builder may have faced scrutiny over its ability to meet deadlines or fulfill commitments related to project timelines.

Common reasons for litigation in these cases include contesting penalties imposed for non-compliance or delays and disputes over regulatory requirements. The builder may have contested the fines as excessive or argued that the delays were beyond their control, leading to a pattern of litigation that reflects underlying operational or compliance issues.

The builder's losses in these cases likely stem from several factors, including insufficient evidence to defend their actions, a clear record of non-compliance with legal requirements, and possibly misunderstandings of their obligations regarding project timelines and reporting. The respondent's claim of leniency due to it being their 'first mistake' suggests a lack of experience with regulatory compliance, which could be a recurring issue in their legal disputes.