| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the competitive world of real estate, choosing the right builder can significantly impact your property investment experience. One such builder that has drawn attention is Samay Construction. This blog post aims to provide a detailed analysis of the builder, including case outcomes, patterns in disputes, and recommendations for potential buyers.
Overview of Samay Construction
Samay Construction is primarily engaged in the real estate sector within the state of Gujarat. Despite having established projects, customer feedback has shown that the builder has faced nine complaints in total.
Legal History
- Complaints Filed: 9
- Cases Won: 2
- Cases Lost: 7
Cases Lost (2 Cases)
The cases where Samay Construction has lost predominantly revolve around claims of failing to provide essential common amenities and having structural defects in several units. A noticeable pattern in the lost cases is the withdrawal of the complaints, often after the parties reached an amicable …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Samay Construction, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into the primary disputes faced by the builder. The cases could be grouped into two common themes: Failure to Provide Common Amenities and Structural Defects in Units.
The first theme, Failure to Provide Common Amenities, encompasses a majority of the complaints made by the complainants. In each case, the respondents highlighted the builder's inability to deliver promised common amenities, which are fundamental to homebuyers’ expectations. This suggests a systemic issue within the builder's operational capabilities, possibly related to project management or financial constraints limiting the inclusion of essential amenities.
The second theme, Structural Defects in Units, indicates a worrying trend regarding the builder's quality control practices. Numerous complaints stated that many units exhibited structural defects, raising concerns about the safety and durability of the construction work carried out by Samay Construction. This …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Samay Construction, which the builder won, revealed the following information.
The primary themes in the cases can be categorized into 'Claims of Common Amenities Provision', 'Structural Defects Allegations', and 'Settlement Agreements'. These categories encapsulate the different disputes that emerged during litigation involving the builder.
The complaints predominantly revolved around allegations from the complainants regarding the failure of the builder to provide common amenities and claims of structural defects within the units. Such grievances often arise when buyers feel that their expectations of a property, as outlined in purchase agreements, were not met, resulting in disputes that necessitated legal intervention.
From the summaries, it appears that many cases may have been instigated by buyer dissatisfaction, which could stem from misunderstandings or miscommunication regarding the scope of amenities and structural assurances promised. Notably, the successful resolution of these disputes through …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!