CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Choosing the right builder for your dream home is a crucial decision that can have long-lasting implications. In this blog post, we will take a detailed look at Samir Builders, a construction firm operating in Gujarat, to help potential buyers gauge their reliability and performance. Based on the available data, we will analyze their legal history, assess their strengths and weaknesses, and provide tips for prospective homebuyers.
Samir Builders has faced a total of 2 complaints, both of which resulted in losses for the company. Let’s delve deeper into the specific cases to understand the nature of these complaints and the outcomes.
By being vigilant and asking the right questions, you can better navigate the home-buying experience and choose a builder that aligns with your expectations and aspirations.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against Samir Builders, which it lost, revealed significant insights into the builder's primary disputes. The cases can be grouped into three common themes: Delayed Possession Claims, Non-compliance with Regulatory Requirements, and Penalties for Project Delays.
The first type of case involves delayed possession claims, where buyers contested the builder's failure to hand over possession of properties despite receiving full payment. As seen in the case of the 'Anandavan Residency' project, the builder attributed the delay to incomplete construction, yet was ultimately ordered to deliver possession within three months, highlighting a pattern of inadequate project management.
The second theme revolves around non-compliance with regulatory requirements. In one case, Samir Builders failed to submit the necessary quarterly reports for the same project on the RERA web portal, leading to a penalty of Rs. 50,000/- and a directive to file an updated report. This indicates a concerning lack of adherence to crucial regulatory obligations, which can undermine transparency and trust in the builder's operations.
The common reasons people brought cases to court primarily include disputing project delays and regulatory non-compliance. Buyers are understandably vexed when full payment does not result in timely possession, while regulators are keen to enforce compliance to ensure the integrity of the real estate market. The builder's litigation patterns suggest a defensive approach, often attributing delays to other factors rather than acknowledging potential systemic issues within their operations.
The builder lost these cases predominantly due to insufficient evidence to support their claims, failure to comply with legal and regulatory requirements, and misunderstandings of their obligations regarding project timelines and reporting. The verdicts highlight a need for Samir Builders to rectify significant operational shortcomings to meet the expectations of both its clients and regulatory authorities.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!