| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the competitive landscape of real estate, buyer trust in builders is paramount. This article delves into SAMPAD INFRASTRUCTURE, a builder primarily operating in Gujarat. We will explore their track record, analyze legal cases involving the builder, and provide insights for potential buyers considering their projects.
Overview of SAMPAD INFRASTRUCTURE
SAMPAD INFRASTRUCTURE has managed to maintain a relatively low number of complaints, with only a single complaint recorded. However, it is crucial to note that they have faced a legal challenge which they lost. Understanding the implications of this case can offer valuable insights into the builder's operational integrity and reliability.
Legal Case Details
SAMPAD INFRASTRUCTURE encountered legal scrutiny under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA). The case summarized below highlights a dispute regarding compliance with regulatory requirements:
- Appellant Claim: The Authority accused SAMPAD INFRASTRUCTURE of failing to submit quarterly report details as mandated by the RERA …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against SAMPAD INFRASTRUCTURE, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across the disputes. The cases primarily revolved around two critical issues: regulatory non-compliance and penalties imposed for delays in reporting required information.
The first theme, regulatory non-compliance, highlights the importance of adhering to the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) Act and its associated rules. In the sole case summarized, the builder failed to submit the necessary quarterly report details as mandated by the RERA Act. This shortfall led to a penalty, emphasizing the need for builders to familiarize themselves with legal requirements and fulfill their obligations to maintain transparency and compliance in their dealings.
The penalty for reporting delays is a direct consequence of the builder’s non-compliance. In this instance, the Authority imposed a penalty of Rs. 50,000 on the promoter, indicating a system in place to enforce regulatory adherence. Such penalties suggest a …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!
Submit Your Review
Interested in buying from SAMPAD INFRASTRUCTURE?
Leave your details – our team will call you back within 5 minutes.