CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
When it comes to selecting a builder for your next property investment, understanding their track record can play a crucial role in your decision-making process. In this post, we take a close look at Samprati Procon Partnership Firm, a builder operating in Gujarat, and analyze their performance based on the legal challenges they've faced.
Samprati Procon Partnership Firm, though actively engaged in real estate development, has a notable record of legal complaints. With only one complaint filed against them, the builder lost the case, which depicts some of the challenges they may have faced in their operations.
Overall, potential buyers must exercise caution when considering purchasing from Samprati Procon Partnership Firm. The record of a lost case and the imposed penalties suggest a need for greater diligence in their business operations.
In summary, while Samprati Procon Partnership Firm operates within Gujarat's real estate market, their legal history and the implications of their past challenges warrant close scrutiny from prospective buyers.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against Samprati Procon Partnership Firm, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across the disputes. The cases primarily revolved around the builder's non-compliance with the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) Act, particularly concerning advance payments and the requirement for written agreements for sale.
The most notable case involved the Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority claiming that the builder had accepted more than 10% of the amount as an advance payment without formalizing a written agreement for sale, which is a clear violation of Section 13(1) of the RERA Act. The builder's defense centered around unforeseen circumstances and a promise to rectify the situation within two months, yet this did not mitigate the penalty imposed by the Authority.
Common reasons for the disputes in these cases include regulatory violations, specifically regarding payment acceptance and documentation requirements. People brought cases to court primarily to contest the builder’s actions, which were deemed to be in breach of statutory obligations. A pattern emerges where the builder faced litigation due to a lack of adherence to the RERA Act, highlighting the importance of compliance in the real estate sector.
The builder lost these cases predominantly due to their failure to comply with the RERA Act. The violations were not only procedural but also highlighted a broader issue of non-conformity with regulatory standards. In each case, the builder’s defense was insufficient to reverse the decision made by the Authority, leading to penalties and mandatory corrective actions.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!