SAMUDRA DARSHAN GRUHPRAVESH LLP

Introduction

In the competitive world of real estate, the reputation of a builder is paramount, influencing buyers' decisions significantly. Samudra Darshan Gruhpravesh LLP has been a notable player with a distinct legal history. This blog explores the builder's legal track record, shedding light on the number of complaints, victories, and losses in the legal arena.

Legal Case Overview

Samudra Darshan Gruhpravesh LLP has recorded a total of 17 complaints against it, with six cases won and eleven cases lost. The majority of the legal battles have taken place in Maharashtra, reflecting the builder's operational focus within this single state.

Cases Lost by Samudra Darshan Gruhpravesh LLP

The builder has faced 11 cases that it filed and lost. A common thread in these lost cases is the failure to establish a sufficient cause for delay in filing appeals against a previous order dated November 5, 2019, made by a member of …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Analysis of the cases filed by the builder Samudra Darshan Gruhpravesh LLP, which it lost, reveals several recurring themes indicative of underlying issues in the builder's approach and operations. Notably, many of these cases can be grouped into specific categories that highlight the nature of the disputes and the challenges faced by the builder.

One of the most prominent themes is the 'Condonation of Delay in Appeals'. In numerous cases, the builder sought to condone delays in filing appeals against orders from MahaRERA, citing justifications that often fell short of convincing the courts. This suggests a pattern where the builder either struggled to adhere to legal timelines or encountered obstacles in sustaining their claims against the order's issuance.

Additionally, the 'Disputes over Regulatory Compliance' form a significant part of the builder's litigation history. The repeated arguments from respondents regarding the builder's failure to establish sufficient cause for delays indicate ongoing …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Samudra Darshan Gruhpravesh LLP, which the builder won, revealed several recurring themes and insights into the nature of disputes typically encountered in real estate. The cases prominently revolved around issues such as privity of contract, liability disputes between the new developer/society and flat purchasers, and the claims for relief against developers regarding the performance of their contractual obligations.

The primary type of dispute involved privity of contract, where claimants asserted that the new developers were liable for addressing their concerns and obligations despite a lack of direct contractual relationships. Many appellants contended that the new developer and the society should execute agreements directly with them, but the respondent builders highlighted the absence of any contractual ties, leading to the rejection of such claims.

Reasons for bringing these cases to court generally revolved around contesting the responsibilities and liabilities of …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis