CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
In the realm of real estate, the reputation of a builder holds significant weight in the decision-making process of potential homebuyers. One such entity is Samyak Resources Private Limited, operating principally in Madhya Pradesh. This post aims to provide an overview of Samyak Resources, exploring their legal standing through a review of complaints, court cases, and overall credibility based on public records.
Samyak Resources Private Limited is a builder with a limited presence, indicated by their operations being confined to Madhya Pradesh. With only one complaint recorded, it might seem that the company has a relatively clean slate. However, a deeper examination of their legal history reveals concerns that buyers should be aware of.
Two significant cases have been documented concerning Samyak Resources:
Based on the provided data, Samyak Resources Private Limited exhibits some troubling signs for potential buyers. Their history shows negative outcomes arising from unmet contractual obligations, which is a crucial factor to consider when contemplating a purchase.
In summary, while Samyak Resources maintains a minor complaint history, the significant nature of the single legal case suggests a potentially risky investment for homebuyers. Proceed with caution and implement thorough checks before making any commitments.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Samyak Resources Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The disputes primarily center around two topics: incomplete construction claims and deposit refund disputes.
Many of the cases involve claims from buyers that the builder failed to complete their residential units as per the agreed-upon specifications and timelines. These incomplete construction claims often overlap with deposit refund disputes, where buyers seek the return of their deposits along with interest after the builder's failure to deliver completed units.
A common reason for litigation in these cases is the builder's inability to fulfill their contractual obligations, which leads buyers to contest the retention of their deposits. The builders' defense typically revolves around their claim that buyers are not entitled to refunds, indicating a fundamental communication gap or misunderstanding of contractual terms.
The builder's losses in these cases can be attributed to several factors. The primary reason is their failure to complete the promised construction on time and in accordance with the agreements. Additionally, the builders may have lacked sufficient evidence to support their claims of entitlement to the deposits or may have failed to comply with legal requirements regarding real estate transactions. The authority's decision to return deposits with interest showcases a legal recognition of buyers' rights in the face of incomplete deliveries, serving as a warning to builders about the implications of not meeting their commitments.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
55-20-043 | Madhya Pradesh | The applicant, Shri Atmaprakash Sharma, filed a c… | ["Non-completion of… | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t… | Shri Atmaprakash Sh… | Samyak Rehearses Pr… | https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/641666176371.pdf |