SANDEEP SINGH JOHAL HUF

Introduction

When it comes to purchasing property, trust and reliability are paramount for buyers. In this blog post, we will explore the profile of builder Sandeep Singh Johal HUF, focusing on their performance, legal history, and the implications for potential buyers.

Builder Profile

Name: Sandeep Singh Johal HUF
States with Projects: Haryana

Legal Case Overview

In examining the legal backdrop for Sandeep Singh Johal HUF, it is notable that the builder has encountered legal challenges:

• Number of Complaints: 2
• Cases Won: 2
• Cases Lost: 0

Breakdown of Legal Cases

1. Case 1:
   - Appellant Claim: The complainant sought assured returns and execution of the buyer's agreement.
   - Respondent Claim: The builder argued that the complainant was not entitled to the promised assured returns and contended the agreement was inexecutible.
   - Final Verdict: The authority ruled in favor of the complainant, directing the builder to pay assured returns, execute the buyer's agreement, and issue a conveyance deed.
2. Case 2:
   - Appellant Claim: Similar to the first case, the complainant sought assured returns and the execution of the buyer's agreement.
   - Respondent Claim: Again, the builder maintained that no assured returns were due and that the agreement was non-executable.
   - Final Verdict: Just like the first case, the authority ruled in favor of the complainant.

Analysis of Legal Performance

Winning Patterns

Both cases won by the builder carried a common theme. The appellants were seeking assured returns and an executable buyer's agreement, and in each instance, the authority was convinced that these claims were valid. The ruling favored the complainants, leading to the builder being directed to execute actions that ensured compliance with the buyer's expectations.

This indicates that the builder has likely followed a behavior pattern that may not prioritize the execution of promised buyer agreements, leading to legal complications.

Losing Patterns

While the builder has not lost any cases, the repeated nature of the claims against them demonstrates a common grievance related to the assurance of returns and party obligations to uphold agreements. Such patterns can offer insight into systemic issues within the builder's operations that potential buyers should consider.

Conclusion

Overall Assessment
Sandeep Singh Johal HUF has shown a strong legal performance, winning all cases filed against them. However, the frequency of complaints regarding assured returns and agreement execution suggests areas for improvement in customer relations and contract adherence.

Tips for Potential Buyers

• Understand Your Agreements: Before entering into a deal, ensure you thoroughly comprehend the terms of your buyer's agreement, specifically regarding guaranteed returns and what they entail.
• Check Legal Histories: While Sandeep Singh Johal HUF has maintained a clean record in winning cases, it’s wise to investigate any legal histories to see if similar complaints could arise.
• Seek Customer Feedback: Engaging with current or previous clients can offer insight into their experiences and the builder’s reliability.

General Tips When Selecting a Builder

1. Review the Builder's Reputation: Research online reviews and customer testimonials for insights into past performance.
2. Examine Legal Records: Investigate any legal actions relating to the builder to assess consistency in delivering on promises.
3. Visit Completed Projects: Whenever possible, check out completed projects to get a firsthand view of the quality of work provided.
4. Negotiate Clear Terms: Ensure that all agreements are clear and include specific terms about warranties, returns, and responsibilities.

By keeping these factors in mind, buyers can make more informed decisions when considering Sandeep Singh Johal HUF or any other builder.

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder Sandeep Singh Johal HUF, which he won, revealed the following information.

The builder primarily filed claims related to assured returns and the execution of buyer's agreements. These cases were categorized under common themes like 'Assured Returns Claims' and 'Execution of Buyer's Agreement.' The overarching disputes often indicated a tension between the builder's assurances to buyers and the latter's claims regarding their entitlements under executed agreements.

The reason the builder brought these cases to court commonly revolved around contesting claims made by buyers, predominantly over assured returns. In many instances, the builder faced accusations from buyers claiming they were entitled to returns that weren't guaranteed or disputing the enforceability of agreements. This indicates that misunderstandings regarding contractual terms might often lead to litigation.

The success of the builder in these cases can be attributed to several factors. A notable pattern is the insufficient evidence presented by respondents, which often failed to substantiate their claims. There were also indications of non-compliance with legal or regulatory requirements from the opposing parties, which played in favor of the builder. For instance, when buyers were unable to adhere to interim directions or establish valid grievances, the builder successfully defended initial claims against them.

This analysis sheds light on the builder's reputation and reflects broader trends in the real estate market. It highlights that while there can be legitimate disputes, there are also scenarios where buyers may present unfounded accusations. Sandeep Singh Johal HUF has demonstrated a robust ability to navigate these challenges and uphold its interests, suggesting a resilient and dependable legal stance.

For potential buyers, this analysis serves as a crucial reminder regarding the importance of making informed decisions. The realities of real estate transactions involve complexities that can lead to misunderstandings, and not all claims against builders hold merit. Buyers should approach such claims critically and rely on verified information before forming judgments about a builder's reputation. Understanding the nuances behind legal disputes can significantly influence buyer confidence in the builder's integrity and reliability.