CIN | U45209TG2013PTC087870 |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | 2nd Floor of P Janapa Reddy Pearl Plot No 764, Road No 39 & 44 Jubilee Hills Hyderabad TG 500033 IN |
Company Status | Private |
Overall Case Outcomes
In the competitive world of real estate, the reputation of a builder can significantly influence a buyer's decision. This blog post delves into the journey of Sandstone Infra India Private Limited, a builder based in Telangana, highlighting their legal challenges and providing insights for potential buyers.
Sandstone Infra India Private Limited has recorded one formal complaint against them, resulting in one loss for the builder. Given the geographical focus on Telangana, this builder seems to be actively participating in the regional real estate market, yet the legal outcomes raise questions about their operating standards and customer satisfaction.
The sole complaint against Sandstone Infra involved allegations of non-compliance with the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. The complainant asserted that the builder failed to register the plot and provide possession within the agreed timeframe. In response, Sandstone Infra cited the COVID-19 lockdown as a justification for the delays.
Final Verdict: The legal authority found in favor of the complainant, imposing a penalty on Sandstone Infra and mandating them to register the plot and release the mortgage. This outcome illustrates a significant legal setback for the builder, affecting their credibility and reputation.
The common factor in the builder's lone loss appears to be a failure to comply with statutory regulations and timelines as defined by the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. Buyers expect timely possession and legal formalities, and failure to meet these expectations can lead to legal repercussions and diminished buyer trust.
Interestingly, there seems to be a lack of cases won or successful defenses by Sandstone Infra. This might indicate either a lack of aggressive legal representation or an overall deficiency in addressing buyer grievances preemptively, leading to complaints that escalate to legal actions.
The history of Sandstone Infra India Private Limited showcases a troubling legal track record, with zero wins and one loss. Given the current data, potential buyers should approach this builder with a degree of caution, particularly due to the implications of the single complaint. Legal challenges can signify underlying operational issues or mismanagement.
While Sandstone Infra India Private Limited may offer enticing projects in Telangana, the legal issues reflected in their complaint history warrant careful consideration. Prospective buyers should conduct thorough due diligence and remain vigilant regarding their rights and the contractor’s obligations. By following the tips outlined above, buyers can make more informed decisions and protect their interests in real estate transactions.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against Sandstone Infra India Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The disputes primarily center around three topics: delayed possession claims, non-compliance with the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA), and penalties imposed for project delays.
Many of the cases involve claims from buyers that the builder failed to provide possession of their plots within the agreed-upon timeframe. In response, the builder often cited the COVID-19 pandemic and the ensuing lockdown as the cause for these delays. However, as evidenced by the outcomes, the authorities did not accept this defense and imposed penalties on the builder, mandating the registration of plots in favor of the complainants.
A common reason for litigation in these cases was the builder’s non-compliance with RERA. Buyers contested the builder's actions, such as failing to register the plot as required by the law. The builder's inability to meet regulatory standards created significant grievances among buyers, leading to legal recourse.
The builder faced penalties due to a combination of these factors—delays in possession and non-compliance with RERA. The authorities found the builder's defenses inadequate, often highlighting insufficient evidence to support their claims of pandemic-related delays. This trend indicates a pattern where builders may attempt to attribute their failures to external factors rather than taking responsibility for adherence to timelines and regulations.
In conclusion, the cases against Sandstone Infra India Private Limited serve as a cautionary tale for buyers regarding the importance of thorough due diligence. Buyers should be mindful of builders’ compliance with RERA and their track record on timely possession and project completion. Understanding these factors can help buyers make informed decisions and avoid potential pitfalls in real estate transactions.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!