SANDWOODS INFRATECH PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

In the realm of real estate, choosing the right builder is vital for ensuring a smooth home-buying experience. Today, we will delve into the performance of Sandwoods Infratech Projects Private Limited, a builder that has encountered several legal challenges. With a total of three complaints that all resulted in unfavorable outcomes, it's crucial to analyze the details surrounding these cases.

Overview of Complaints and Legal Cases

Sandwoods Infratech Projects Private Limited has faced a total of three legal complaints against them. They did not win any of these cases, indicating a troubling trend for potential buyers. Here’s a breakdown of the cases:

1. Case 1: Dismissed as the complaint was withdrawn.
2. Case 2: Also dismissed due to withdrawal of the complaint.
3. Case 3: In this case, the complainant alleged that the builder delayed possession of the flat beyond the 36-month agreed timeframe and sought interest for the extended delay. The builder countered that the delay was due to external factors and offered a minimal compensation of Rs. 5 per month. The authority ruled that the builder must pay interest from the date of notification until possession was granted.

Analysis of Legal Trends

Patterns in Cases Lost:

• Withdrawal of Complaints: A significant pattern is the dismissal of two cases simply due to withdrawal by the complainants. This could imply multiple factors at play, such as dissatisfaction with the legal process, or perhaps an expectation of resolution through alternative means.
• Lack of Favorable Outcomes: The absence of any cases won highlights a concerning trend regarding trust and accountability. The legal battles indicate that the builder has struggled to uphold their commitments to clients, resulting in unfavorable judgments.

Patterns in Cases Won:

• Cases Dismissed without Merit: The builder has experienced some success in having complaints dismissed, indicating that at least in certain instances, the complaints may not have been strong enough to warrant a legal battle.
• Minimal Compensations Offered: In the third case, the builder’s offer of a mere Rs. 5 compensation per month for the delay suggests a lack of seriousness in addressing client grievances, which may have contributed to the dissatisfaction leading to complaints.

Conclusion

Based on the data presented, Sandwoods Infratech Projects Private Limited has a challenging track record. With all three complaints resulting in losses or dismissals without resolution, potential buyers should approach with caution. The lack of resolved issues and unsatisfactory compensations may raise doubts about the reliability and accountability of this builder.

Tips for Potential Buyers Considering Sandwoods Infratech Projects:

1. Conduct Thorough Research: Investigate more about the builder's past projects and seek reviews from current homeowners to gauge satisfaction levels.
2. Read the Fine Print: Ensure you understand all terms outlined in contracts, particularly timelines for possession and penalties for delays.
3. Evaluate Legal History: Awareness of the builder's legal history can provide insight into potential risks involved in purchasing a property from them.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder:

• Check Credentials: Always verify the builder’s registration, licenses, and past project successes to ensure legitimacy.
• Communicate Clearly: Maintain open channels of communication with the builder during the process to avoid misunderstandings.
• Look for Transparency: A reputable builder will willingly share information regarding project timelines, costs, and potential risks.

Buying a home is a significant investment; therefore, equipping yourself with information and insights is paramount. Fortifying oneself with knowledge can help you make informed choices when selecting a builder.

Analysis of the cases filed against Sandwoods Infratech Projects Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The cases primarily revolve around delayed possession claims, highlighting significant concerns from buyers regarding the builder's ability to deliver properties on time.

The most common theme among these cases is delayed possession, where buyers allege that the builder failed to provide their promised flats within the agreed-upon timeframe—often cited as 36 months in these instances. For example, in one case, the complainant sought interest compensation for the delay, indicating a growing expectation from buyers for timely possession and adequate compensation for delays.

The builder's defense often revolves around claims of unforeseen circumstances beyond their control, which they argue contributed to the delays. However, the legal authorities did not accept this defense in all cases, particularly when it came to compensation. Instead of accepting the builder's offer of Rs. 5/- per month for the delay, which is arguably minimal, the Authority prescribed a higher interest rate based on regulatory standards (Rule 16 of the Punjab State Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules, 2017). This highlights a regulatory compliance issue, as the builder's compensation offer was not in line with established rules, indicating a potential lack of understanding or adherence to legal standards.

People commonly bring cases to court in these situations primarily due to financial and emotional investment in their property. Delays often result in additional personal and financial burdens, such as rent or mortgage on another property while waiting to move into the new one. The patterns emerging from these summaries suggest that buyers are increasingly aware of their rights, particularly regarding timely delivery and adequate compensation for delays.

The builder lost these cases chiefly due to their failure to meet the promised timelines and non-compliance with the established regulatory frameworks regarding compensation. The Authorities' decisions reflect a commitment to protecting buyers' rights and ensuring that builders adhere to standards that prioritize timely possession and fair compensation.