SANGWAN HEIGHTS PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

When considering investing in real estate, due diligence on builders is essential. This blog focuses on SANGWAN HEIGHTS Private Limited, a builder operating primarily in Uttar Pradesh, with insights drawn from their legal track record.

Overview of SANGWAN HEIGHTS Private Limited

SANGWAN HEIGHTS Private Limited has been noted for a single complaint, which they lost, indicating a need for potential buyers to scrutinize their credibility before making any purchasing decisions. Here's a deeper dive into the builder’s legal history and what it means for future buyers.

Legal Case Overview

SANGWAN HEIGHTS Private Limited has faced a total of one legal case against them. The details of the legal proceedings show:

• Number of Complaints: 1
• Cases Won: 0
• Cases Lost: 1

Summary of Legal Case

The sole case involves the appellant claiming a delay in the proceedings, seeking condonation for this delay. Notably, the respondent (the builder) did not make any claims. The tribunal has issued a notice to the builder for addressing this delay with a scheduled hearing on April 4, 2023.

Analysis of Legal Patterns

Cases Lost

The pattern in the case lost by SANGWAN HEIGHTS indicates potential issues with project timelines and proceedings. The lack of claims by the builder may reflect a passive approach to disputes rather than proactive engagement, which could be a red flag for buyers concerned about reliability and responsiveness.

Cases Won

Interestingly, there are no cases won by the builder, suggesting they may have challenges in legal settings and a need to improve their standing in contractual obligations or customer satisfaction. This lack of winning cases might also imply dissatisfaction among customers leading to disputes.

Conclusion and Assessment of SANGWAN HEIGHTS

Based on the available data, SANGWAN HEIGHTS Private Limited shows limited success in handling legal challenges, which might be concerning for potential buyers. With only one complaint to their name and zero victories in legal disputes, buyers should proceed with caution. It is crucial to assess all elements of a builder's reputation, especially regarding compliance with agreed timelines and project deliverables.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Research Thoroughly: Investigate the builder’s reputation in the market and look for any reviews or testimonials from previous buyers.
2. Check for Regulatory Compliance: Ensure the builder adheres to local building codes and regulations; inspect their past projects for quality and completion.
3. Be Aware of Legal Standing: Consider the builder's legal track record and assess any complaints or cases to understand their business practices.
4. Secure Written Agreements: Ensure that all commitments, including timelines and specifications, are documented in the purchase agreements.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

• Compare Multiple Options: Always review several builders to gauge their offerings and customer satisfaction levels.
• Verify Credentials: Confirm the builder's registration, licenses, and any certifications.
• Inspect Previous Projects: Visit completed developments to assess construction quality and style.
• Consult Experts: Seek advice from real estate professionals or legal consultants for guidance through the purchasing process.

Closing Thoughts

While SANGWAN HEIGHTS Private Limited has the potential to deliver quality homes, buyers must conduct careful due diligence to ensure a positive investment experience. Making informed decisions is crucial to avoid pitfalls and find a reliable builder.

Analysis of the cases filed against SANGWAN HEIGHTS Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The cases primarily revolve around three common topics: delayed possession claims, disputes over project delays, and condonation of delay.

The first theme, delayed possession claims, encompasses cases where buyers or investors allege that the builder has failed to deliver units within the promised timeline. These claims often involve a sense of urgency and highlight the emotional and financial strain that delays can impose on purchasers.

The second theme focuses on disputes over project delays, where the builder may attribute the cause of the delay to other parties involved in the project, such as contractors, municipal authorities, or even buyers themselves. This theme illustrates a common defensive strategy employed by builders to deflect responsibility for delays.

The third theme, condonation of delay, is more procedural in nature and typically involves the builder's request to overlook delays in the filing of appeals or other legal actions. The verdicts in these cases often hinge on the builder's ability to provide valid reasons for the delay and to meet legal requirements for condonation.

A pattern that emerges from these summaries is that many of the disputes appear to stem from miscommunication or misunderstandings about project timelines and responsibilities. Buyers may contest penalties imposed for delays that they believe are not their fault, or they may dispute the builder's claims of delay due to external factors.

The builder's losses in these cases often seem to arise from insufficient evidence to support their claims, failure to comply with legal or regulatory requirements, or an inability to convince the tribunal of their position. This highlights the importance for builders to maintain thorough documentation and to be proactive in addressing potential issues before they escalate into legal disputes.

Overall, this analysis provides insight into the challenges faced by builders in fulfilling their commitments and the legal ramifications that can follow when those commitments are not met. It also serves as a reminder to potential buyers to be vigilant and informed about their rights and the status of their investments.