CIN | U70100CT2009PTC021074 |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | 3RD FLOOR, KRISHNA COMPLEX, JAIL ROAD , RAIPUR, Chattisgarh, India - 492001 |
Company Status | Private |
Overall Case Outcomes
Sanjay Bajpai Builders Private Limited is a builder primarily operating in Chhattisgarh, known for its residential projects. However, potential buyers considering investment in properties from this builder should tread carefully, given the legal history and the numbers that tell a sobering story of customer dissatisfaction.
The builder has faced a total of 4 complaints, losing each one without a single victory in court. This concerning statistic raises questions on the accountability and financial practices of the business, impacting its credibility in the real estate market.
An examination of the cases filed against Sanjay Bajpai Builders reveals troubling trends. While the specific details about the outcomes highlight a recurring pattern of client dissatisfaction:
Reviewing the operational and legal history of Sanjay Bajpai Builders Private Limited unveils a troubling picture for potential homebuyers. Given that all identified complaints resulted in losses for the builder and continued issues regarding completion and financial accountability, it is advisable for buyers to proceed with caution.
In conclusion, while choosing a builder, especially one with a complex legal backdrop like Sanjay Bajpai Builders, due diligence is pivotal in ensuring a secure investment.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against Sanjay Bajpai Builders Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into the recurring themes surrounding their legal disputes.
The cases can be broadly categorized into three themes: Delayed Possession Claims, Incomplete Construction and Refund Disputes, and Payment Disputes and Defaults. Each of these themes highlights common grievances from the applicants and sheds light on the builder's operational shortcomings.
Delayed Possession Claims predominantly feature applicants seeking to expedite the construction process and obtain timely possession of their properties. In these cases, the builder was often accused of failing to complete projects within agreed-upon timelines, leading to frustration and loss for the purchasers. The authority typically directed the builder to complete the construction within defined periods, showcasing a pattern where the builder was held accountable for delays.
Incomplete Construction and Refund Disputes presented scenarios where buyers made substantial payments for properties that were left unfinished. Here, the builder's inability to return funds owed was frequently attributed to financial difficulties, prompting an unconventional solution where buyers were offered possession of the incomplete homes, with the understanding that they would finish the remaining work themselves. This highlights a troubling trend where buyers were not only denied their right to a completed property but also burdened with the responsibility of finishing the construction.
Payment Disputes and Defaults revolved around the builder's claims of non-received payments or alleged payment defaults from the applicants. However, the outcomes suggest that the builder's assertions did not meet the required evidentiary standards, as the decisions overwhelmingly favored the applicants, indicating potential mismanagement or lack of transparency on the part of the builder regarding payment records and project obligations.
A pattern emerges where common triggers for litigation include financial disputes, delay attributions, and disagreements over project delivery timelines. The builder's losses in these cases often stem from insufficient evidence to support their claims, failure to adhere to agreed-upon payment schedules, and a consistent inability to meet project timelines.
In conclusion, the analysis demonstrates a need for buyers to exercise caution when engaging with Sanjay Bajpai Builders Private Limited. The high volume of legal disputes, particularly regarding delayed possession and unfinished projects, suggests operational inefficiencies that may not be apparent upfront. Buyers should thoroughly vet the builder's reputation, carefully review payment terms, and seek clarity on project timelines before committing to any agreements.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!