SANJAY INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED
- No of Complaints: 13
- States (Active in): Odisha
| CIN | U45201OR2007PTC009217 |
|---|---|
| Year Established | 12-Mar-07 |
| Address | FLAT NO.-E-11, HIG DELUX NETAJI SUBAS ENCLAVE , GADAKAN, MANCHESW AR , BHUBANESWAR, Orissa, India - 751017 |
| Company Status | Private |
Introduction
In the fast-paced real estate market, the reputation and reliability of builders are paramount for prospective homebuyers. One such builder, Sanjay Infrastructure Development Private Limited, has recently come under scrutiny due to a series of legal cases that raise significant concerns. This blog post aims to delve into the builder's history, analyze the patterns in their legal challenges, and provide critical insights for potential buyers considering their properties in Odisha.
Legal Case Overview
Sanjay Infrastructure Development Private Limited has faced a total of 13 complaints, with 0 victories in the cases they contested. This alarming statistic highlights a consistent struggle with fulfilling their commitments to buyers, primarily regarding the purchase of flats and basic property rights.
Analysis of Legal Cases
Common Factors in Lost Cases
A thorough review of the 13 legal disputes reveals several patterns closely associated with the complaints against Sanjay Infrastructure:
- Failure to Execute Sale Deeds and Handover Possession: A significant number of cases revolve around the builder’s inability to execute timely sale deeds and hand over possession of flats despite receiving payment. Complainants repeatedly expressed that they had fulfilled their financial obligations, yet possession was either delayed or not provided.
- Claims of Incomplete Payments: The builder often countered complaints by claiming that full payments were not received from the buyers. This defense suggests potential discrepancies in financial transactions, where buyers and the builder have mounted accusations against each other.
- Lack of Completion and Occupancy Certificates: Many complaints point towards the absence of mandatory completion and occupancy certificates, indicating a failure in legal compliance regarding property readiness for occupancy.
- Penalty for Legal Violations: The builder has faced penalties for violating relevant real estate regulations, reinforcing a detrimental pattern in their operational practices.
Common Factors in Cases Where Complaints Were Allowed
While the builder has not won any cases, it is essential to note what the authorities concluded in favor of the complainants:
- Directives for Handover and Execution of Deeds: In each instance where the ruling favored the complainants, authorities consistently directed Sanjay Infrastructure to hand over flat possession and execute necessary legal documents such as conveyance deeds. This unanimous decision underscores the builder's failure in executing its obligations.
- Compensation Mandates: In a notable case, the authority mandated a refund of the amounts paid along with compounded interest, suggesting significant mismanagement on the builder’s part.
Conclusion
Sanjay Infrastructure Development Private Limited's track record presents serious red flags for potential buyers. The builder has lost all 13 complaints, indicative of a systemic issue in fulfilling contractual obligations and adhering to real estate regulations. Buyers should approach this builder with caution, as the lack of successful legal defenses and emerging complaints reveal a troubling history.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Conduct Thorough Research: Before committing to purchasing property from Sanjay Infrastructure, investigate their project history, reviews from past customers, and legal standings.
- Demand Documentation: Ensure you receive clear documentation regarding payment status, sale deeds, and occupancy certificates, prior to any financial transactions.
- Consult Legal Expertise: Consider hiring a legal advisor to navigate through property agreements and potential risks involved in purchasing from this builder.
General Tips for Selecting a Builder
- Review Track Record: Look for builders with a strong history of delivering projects on time and a good reputation among homebuyers.
- Check for Legal Compliance: Verify that the builder possesses all necessary licenses and that their projects comply with local regulations.
- Utilize Buyer Reviews: Seek feedback from previous buyers to gauge satisfaction levels regarding quality, delivery timelines, and customer service.
- Inspect Completed Projects: Visiting completed projects by the builder can provide insights into their work quality and operational reliability.
In conclusion, Sanjay Infrastructure Development's legal history is a cautionary tale for prospective buyers. By approaching with careful consideration and thorough research, buyers can safeguard their investments in real estate.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Sanjay Infrastructure Development Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals significant insights into the common themes and disputes faced by the builder. The cases can be broadly categorized into several types, including delayed possession claims, failure to execute conveyance deeds, non-compliance with regulatory requirements, disputes over payment and consideration, and penalties for project delays.
The majority of the cases revolved around delayed possession claims, where the complainants alleged that the builder had failed to hand over possession of their flats despite receiving full payment. This points to an apparent mismanagement or inability of the builder to fulfill their contractual obligations on time, a factor that commonly triggers litigation in real estate transactions.
Another recurring theme was the builder's failure to execute conveyance deeds, which further aggravated the grievances of the complainants. This not only delayed the formal transfer of property but also created uncertainty and dissatisfaction among buyers. The builder's defense often revolved around claims of incomplete payments or internal disputes, which indicates a lack of transparency and clear communication in their dealings.
Non-compliance with regulatory requirements also emerged as a key issue, with the builder facing penalties for delivering possession of units without obtaining the necessary occupancy certificates. This highlights a concerning trend where the builder prioritized profit over the safety and legal rights of buyers, leading to serious repercussions under the Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016.
In each case, the builder's losses can be attributed to several common factors, primarily including insufficient evidence to support their claims, failure to comply with legal and regulatory standards, and a consistent pattern of neglecting to fulfill their commitments to buyers. The authorities' decisions reflect a need for buyers to be vigilant and proactive in their rights, as well as a call for builders to adhere to ethical practices and ensure customer satisfaction and compliance in real estate ventures.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complaint Case No. … | Odisha | The complainants, Minakhi Mohanty and Atula Kumar… | Non-delivery of fla… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed tha… | Atula Kumar Mohanty | Sanjay Infrastructu… | https://rera.odisha.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/62-of-23.pdf |
| 405 of 2022 | Odisha | The complainant, Bhimsen Guru, filed a case again… | ["Refund of advance… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed refu… | Bhimsen Guru | Sanjay Infrastructu… | https://rera.odisha.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Case-No-405-of-2022.pdf |
| 356 of 2022 | Odisha | The complainants, Pramod Kumar Patra and Subhalax… | ["Non-provision of … | {"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed tha… | Subhalaxmi Patra | Sanjay Infrastructu… | https://rera.odisha.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/356-of-22.pdf |
| mpl No. 273 of 2022 | Odisha | The complainant, Rashmita Das, filed a complaint … | ["Non-delivery of f… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that… | Rashmita Das | Sanjay Infrastructu… | https://rera.odisha.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/273-of-2022.pdf |
| Suo motu Complaint … | Odisha | The respondent, M/s Sanjay Infrastructure Develop… | ["Violation of Sect… | {"appellant_claim": "", "respondent_claim": "The … | Sanjay Infrastructu… | https://rera.odisha.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/old-cc-no-176-21_merged.pdf |