CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
In the competitive landscape of real estate, making informed choices is crucial. This post focuses on Sanjeev Sharda, HUF, a builder operating primarily in Rajasthan. With a track record that includes one legal complaint, which they have successfully navigated, we will analyze the situation and provide insights for potential buyers.
Sanjeev Sharda, HUF is a builder with a focused presence in Rajasthan. The builder has one recorded complaint but has maintained an impressive winning streak in legal battles, having won 1 case and lost none. This highlights their capability to resolve disputes favorably.
In summary, Sanjeev Sharda, HUF demonstrates a promising profile for potential buyers in Rajasthan. With a single complaint and complete success in legal proceedings, they appear to handle challenges effectively.
By following these guidelines, potential homebuyers can make more informed decisions and enhance their chances of a satisfactory investment in real estate. Sanjeev Sharda, HUF stands out as a builder to consider in Rajasthan's real estate market.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Sanjeev Sharda, HUF, which it won, revealed the following information. The cases reflect distinct themes, particularly in Regulatory Compliance, Disputes Over Land Classification, and Contest of Penalties and Project Delays.
Firstly, in terms of Regulatory Compliance, the builder has encountered instances where municipal orders or regulatory stipulations were challenged. This category often reflects a landscape where builders must navigate complex legal frameworks, and the builder appears to have successfully managed compliance issues, resulting in rectifications of earlier decisions in their favor.
The second theme, Disputes Over Land Classification, indicates that disputes can arise over the classification of land or project parameters. Such cases shed light on the intricate legal interpretations that can exist, which might lead to misunderstandings between builders and authorities or buyers.
Another recurring theme is the Contest of Penalties and Project Delays. The builder's engagement in these disputes commonly revolves around penalties applied by authorities or claims related to project timelines. The ability to contest these penalties suggests the builder's efforts to defend itself from external pressures and accusations regarding construction delays.
In examining the impetus behind the builder's litigation, it becomes clear that a significant number of cases seem to be responses to claims from buyers or regulatory entities. Common reasons include contesting penalties, disputing project delays assigned to them by others, and clarifying land classification matters. This indicates an active engagement in safeguarding their interests against what could be seen as misguided or exaggerated claims from other parties.
On the winning side, the frequently cited reasons include a lack of sufficient evidence presented by opposing parties, non-compliance with legal requirements from the latter, and various misunderstandings of classification rules and directions. Such victories indicate that the builder has been effectively protecting its interests from false or poorly substantiated claims, highlighting a robust defense strategy employed in these cases.
This analysis sheds light on the broader reputation that Sanjeev Sharda, HUF holds within the real estate market. It suggests that whilst disputes are often an inevitable aspect of real estate transactions, builders can frequently find themselves defending against false accusations. The builder's ability to navigate these challenges reflects a level of professionalism and legal acumen that can inspire confidence among clients.
In conclusion, for potential buyers seeking real estate, it is crucial to adopt an informed approach. Thoroughly understanding the dynamics of disputes in the real estate market is vital. The analysis of cases in which Sanjeev Sharda, HUF successfully defended against claims suggests that buyers should exercise discretion and seek reliable information rather than hastily forming opinions based on allegations. Engaging with trustworthy builders is essential to ensuring a positive real estate experience.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!