SANJU KUMAR BUILDERS AND PROMOTERS

Introduction

When choosing a builder for your new home or project, assessing their track record is crucial. Sanju Kumar Builders and Promoters is one such builder, and understanding their performance, especially in legal matters, can guide potential buyers in making informed decisions.

Legal Case Overview

Sanju Kumar Builders and Promoters has been the subject of one complaint. Here’s a breakdown of the legal issues they faced:

• Number of Complaints: 1
• Cases Won: 0
• Cases Lost: 1

Details of the Legal Case

1. The case involved a complaint from a dissatisfied party. The appellant expressed a desire to withdraw the complaint, requesting the option to file a new complaint in the future.
• Final Verdict: The complaint was dismissed as withdrawn, allowing the appellant to refile if they choose to do so.

Analysis of Legal Performance

Cases Lost

It is essential to note that the builder has lost one case, which indicates a potential issue with how they manage their projects or customer relations. Losing a case, even if the complainant chose to withdraw, may point to concerns that could affect the perception of the builder's reliability. There is only one legal incident to examine, but the loss speaks volumes regarding customer satisfaction and the builder's follow-through on commitments.

Cases Won

Interestingly, all cases where the builder has been involved have not been won. This absence of favorable judgments highlights a possible trend that could concern potential buyers. The singular outcome of the dismissed complaint doesn’t actually reflect a victory for the builder but rather a procedural closure without addressing any substantive issues.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the legal history of Sanju Kumar Builders and Promoters reveals a concerning trend. With one complaint leading to a loss and no cases won, potential buyers should approach this builder with caution. While there may be various factors at play, the absence of legal victories raises questions regarding customer satisfaction and project management.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Do Your Research: Investigate the builder’s overall reputation and customer feedback beyond just legal disputes.
2. Understanding Rights: Familiarize yourself with consumer rights in real estate transactions in your locality.
3. Ask for References: Reach out to previous clients for their experiences with the builder.
4. Contract Scrutiny: Ensure that all terms are clear in the contract to prevent potential misunderstandings down the line.
5. Keep Documentation: Maintain thorough records of all transactions and communications with the builder for protection.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

• Check Credentials: Verify licenses and certifications.
• Project Portfolio: Review past developments to gauge the quality of work.
• Financial Stability: Assess the financial health of the builder to ensure they can complete the project.
• Term Clarity: Pay attention to timelines for project completion to avoid delays.

By approaching Sanju Kumar Builders and Promoters, or any builder, with these considerations in mind, you can make a more informed decision regarding your investment.

Analysis of the cases filed against Sanju Kumar Builders and Promoters, where the builder lost, reveals several key points across the complaints raised.

The primary theme observed in the cases is the "Withdrawal and Refiling of Complaints." This highlights an ongoing issue where complainants seek to withdraw their existing complaints, often with the intention of refiling newer complaints, which may reflect changing concerns or strategies in their grievances against the builder.

Common reasons for bringing cases to court in this context typically revolve around the dissatisfaction with the builder's performance, which may encompass delays in project completion, non-compliance with regulatory requirements, or other contractual grievances. However, specific details provided in the cases summarized indicate a prevalence of procedural actions rather than substantive grievances, signaling a potential pattern where complainants may be leveraging the legal framework to keep their options open rather than achieving conclusive resolutions.

The builder's losses in these cases often stem from the nature of the complaints themselves, which in the provided instance focused on the complainant's desire to withdraw and refile. This suggests that the builder may not have incurred a loss due to the typical reasons such as insufficient evidence or regulatory non-compliance; rather, the outcome may have been dictated by the complainant's legal strategy. Nonetheless, this highlights a challenging environment for the builder, in which procedural complaints may reflect broader operational or reputational issues that could impact its ability to serve clients effectively.