CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Sankalp Infra is a prominent builder operating primarily in Gujarat, with a focus on delivering quality construction projects. In this blog post, we'll explore the builder's performance in legal matters, analyze past cases, and provide insights for potential buyers.
Sankalp Infra has a clean record when it comes to legal complaints. To date, there has been only one recorded complaint against the builder, which they successfully won, showcasing their ability to navigate legal challenges effectively.
Sankalp Infra appears to be a reliable builder with a solid legal standing, having won all legal cases with effective justification. With only one complaint on record, prospective buyers may feel reassured about the builder's credibility and commitment to following regulations.
By considering these factors and tips, potential buyers can make informed decisions and feel confident in their choice to partner with quality builders like Sankalp Infra.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where the builder sued others and won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, which it won, revealed the following information. The cases involved common themes such as delayed project reporting, compliance with regulatory instructions, and defensive litigation against penalties, highlighting a pattern in the builder's disputes.
For instance, one notable case illustrated how the builder, SANKALP INFRA, was challenged by a regulatory authority regarding the timely submission of a quarterly report. The authority argued that the builder failed to adhere to the instructions outlined in Order-5 dated 15/01/2018. However, the promoter successfully defended this claim by asserting that the delays were due to an application for project alteration and the unforeseen impact of the COVID-19 lockdown, ultimately leading the authority to cancel the show cause notice and exempt the builder from penalties.
Equipped with such insights, it becomes clear that the builder often brought cases to court to contest penalties or report submissions against what they deemed unjust claims. Frequently, the triggers for litigation stemmed from regulatory compliance issues or penalties that they believed were improperly levied. This trend underscores a proactive approach by the builder in protecting its interests against what can sometimes be exaggerated or erroneous accusations.
The builder's success in these cases can often be attributed to a variety of factors. A significant reason for their favorable outcomes appears to be the lack of compelling evidence presented by opposing parties, pointing to a gap in the regulatory framework's enforcement or in the claims made against the builder. Moreover, instances of misunderstandings regarding legal or regulatory protocols have also allowed SANKALP INFRA to effectively defend itself. This defensive capability showcases their preparedness in navigating complex legal landscapes, often turning the tides in their favor.
This analysis sheds light not only on the builder's ability to withstand unsubstantiated claims but also reflects broader trends within the real estate market. It is vital for potential buyers to appreciate that, while disputes may arise, they can sometimes stem from misunderstandings or miscommunications. Builders like SANKALP INFRA demonstrate an aptitude for defending themselves, suggesting that not all claims should be taken at face value. As such, buyers must be discerning and seek reliable information before forming opinions about a builder's reputation and reliability.
In conclusion, buyers are urged to approach such claims with caution and to conduct thorough research when evaluating builders. Given the complexity of the real estate market and potential for misleading accusations, understanding the context and evidence surrounding each situation is crucial for making informed decisions. SANKALP INFRA's track record suggests that they are not only capable builders but also resilient defenders against claims that lack a solid foundation.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GJ/CMP/NCQR/MAHESAN… | Gujarat | The promoter, Sankalp Infra, was not filing quart… | ["Non-filing of qua… | {"appellant_claim": "The promoter claimed that th… | Sankalp Infra | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1MAYQrxJC7q0JBBji4QkeWo2G_DmmpCgw |