SANKLECHA CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED
- No of Complaints: 2
- States (Active in): Maharashtra
| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overview of Sanklecha Construction Private Limited
Sanklecha Construction Private Limited operates primarily in Maharashtra and has been involved in several legal cases. Understanding the builder's reputation and performance is crucial for potential buyers looking to make informed decisions regarding their investments in real estate.
Legal Standing and Performance
As per the latest data, Sanklecha Construction has faced a total of 2 complaints, with 0 cases won and 2 cases lost. This raises concerns about the builder's reliability and the quality of their projects, as it indicates a pattern of unfavorable outcomes in legal battles.
Case Analysis
Cases Won:
Interestingly, while the builder has not won any cases, the data provided mentions two instances related to the condonation of delay in filing an appeal. The appellants claimed they had sufficient cause for the delay, and the tribunal allowed the applications, indicating a procedural success. However, this does not reflect positively on the builder's overall standing as it demonstrates that the underlying complaints that necessitated appeals were found valid, leading to a lack of victories in the anticipated legal disputes.
Cases Lost:
The two cases lost by Sanklecha Construction suggest a lack of adequate responses to legitimate claims made against them. There is a clear pattern indicating that the builder did not successfully counter the complaints filed, leading to adverse judgments. This raises red flags regarding their compliance with legal standards and customer satisfaction.
Conclusion and Recommendations
Overall Assessment
Given the total number of complaints and the outcomes of the cases, potential buyers should approach opportunities with Sanklecha Construction Private Limited with caution. The prevailing absence of favorable rulings could suggest potential problems related to project handling, customer service, or overall building quality.
Tips for Potential Buyers:
- Research and Due Diligence: Always conduct thorough research about the builder. Look for reviews, other cases, and overall satisfaction among previous customers.
- Request Transparency: Ensure that you have clear communication and documented evidence of the builder's promises and deliverables before making a commitment.
- Legal Awareness: Be informed of the legal rights you hold as a buyer. Consulting a legal expert can provide insights into potential concerns relating to the builder's past.
General Tips for Selecting Any Builder:
- Check Reviews and References: Speak to past clients and read online reviews to gauge a builder's reputation.
- Visit Completed Projects: If possible, visit the builder's completed projects to assess the quality of construction firsthand.
- Evaluate Financial Stability: A builder's financial health can impact project completion and quality; inquire about their financial background if possible.
In summary, the history of Sanklecha Construction Private Limited is marked by challenges that potential buyers should take into consideration. Making informed decisions is vital in the real estate market to secure worthwhile investments.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Sanklecha Construction Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across the disputes. The cases primarily revolved around two main topics: delayed possession claims and non-compliance with the prescribed period of limitation.
The first theme, delayed possession claims, encompasses the majority of the cases where the applicants sought condonation of delay in filing their appeals. The common reason for seeking this condonation was the claimants' assertion that they had sufficient cause for not preferring their appeals within the stipulated time frame. This suggests that many of the disputes revolved around the builders' failure to deliver projects on time, which is a recurring issue in the construction sector.
The second theme, non-compliance with the prescribed period of limitation, highlights the builders' consistent difficulty with adhering to legal timelines. In each case summarized, the respondents argued that the applicants had no regard for the prescribed period of limitation, indicating a pattern of disregard for procedural requirements by the builder's clients. This may reflect a broader issue of inadequate client education or a lax attitude toward legal compliance within the construction industry.
The reasons people commonly brought these cases to court primarily include contesting delays and seeking justifications for late actions. The builders' clients often found themselves in litigation due to the builder’s inability to meet project timelines or comply with regulatory requirements. This points to an emerging pattern where delays attributed to builders result in legal consequences, indicating a significant trigger for litigation in this sector.
Finally, examining the outcomes of these cases reveals that the builder lost primarily due to their clients' ability to satisfactorily establish sufficient cause for their late appeals. This underscores an important factor: while the builder’s clients faced scrutiny for their tardiness, they ultimately prevailed by meeting the legal burden of proof for extenuating circumstances. This may highlight a need for builders to more closely monitor their projects’ timelines and to work more transparently with their clients to avoid such disputes.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Misc. Application N… | Maharashtra | Applicants sought condonation of delay in filing … | ["Delay condonation… | {"appellant_claim": "The applicants sought condon… | Mrs. Shital Nitin S… | Sanklecha Construct… | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=10EdVu7591Qf7FSKhO6SPn4NFOGf87Qa7 |