SANLASAR BALAJI REAL INFRA

Introduction

When considering a property purchase, it's crucial to evaluate builders and their reputations. In this blog, we delve into the details surrounding Sanlasar Balaji Real Infra, a builder based in Madhya Pradesh. Though they may present appealing projects, potential buyers should be aware of the builder’s legal history and customer service record.

Legal Cases Overview

Sanlasar Balaji Real Infra has faced a notable number of complaints, with a record of 1 complaint filed against them:

• Complaints: 1
• Cases Won: 0
• Cases Lost: 1

Case Details

The sole complaint made against this builder involved a dispute over the possession of flats. The applicant argued that the builder failed to deliver the flats within the timeframe promised and sought a return of their investment along with interest. Conversely, Sanlasar Balaji Real Infra contended that the delays were due to unforeseen circumstances and requested the complaint's dismissal. Ultimately, the authorities ruled in favor of the applicant, determining that Sanlasar Balaji Real Infra must return the investment with interest and provide compensation.

Analysis of Legal Performance

Cases Lost

The legal challenge faced by Sanlasar Balaji Real Infra highlights a critical pattern when it comes to builder accountability for project completion.

• Common Factors: The primary issue in the case lost was the failure to provide timely possession of flats, suggesting potential inadequacies in project planning or management.

Cases Won

Interestingly, the builder does not have any cases won. The absence of successful defenses raises questions about their operational efficacy and customer service reliability.

Conclusion and Assessment

Based on the information provided, Sanlasar Balaji Real Infra has a concerning track record, particularly illustrated by the loss of their only legal case. Potential buyers should regard the builder’s inability to win cases and the significant unsatisfied customer claim as red flags.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Research Thoroughly: Before making a purchase, conduct in-depth research about the builder’s history and past customer experiences.
2. Verify Legal Standing: Check if the builder has faced multiple complaints and how they have been resolved.
3. Seek Testimonials: Look for feedback from previous clients to gauge satisfaction levels and identify any recurring issues.
4. Understand Terms and Conditions: Ensure that all promises made by the builder are documented within the purchase agreement.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

• Financial Stability: Choose builders who demonstrate solid financial stability, this reduces risk in project completion.
• Track Record: Assess the builder’s history of completing projects on time and managing customer interactions effectively.
• Quality of Work: Investigate the craftsmanship of previously completed projects through site visits when possible.
• Regulatory Compliance: Ensure the builder complies with local regulations and holds necessary licenses to operate.

Final Thoughts

Buying property is a significant investment and requires careful consideration of the builder’s profile. For Sanlasar Balaji Real Infra, their current standing necessitates due diligence before proceeding with any purchasing decisions.

Analysis of the cases filed against Sanlasar Balaji Real Infra, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across the complaints raised by the other parties. The primary disputes can be categorized into three main topics: Delayed Possession Claims, Unforeseen Circumstances Defense, and the need for Compensation for Non-Compliance.

The majority of the cases revolved around Delayed Possession Claims, where applicants sought the return of their consideration amount due to the builder's failure to deliver possession within the agreed timeframe. For instance, in one significant case, the applicant claimed that the builder had not granted them possession of their flats on time, prompting a request for a refund of the amount paid along with interest.

The builder consistently employed an Unforeseen Circumstances Defense, attributing delays to situations beyond their control. However, this defense did not resonate with the Authority, which suggests that the builder may have either failed to provide sufficient evidence of such circumstances or that the reasons provided did not meet the legal standards for acceptability in the context of real estate transactions.

The verdicts in these cases often mandated Compensation for Non-Compliance, requiring the builder to pay the consideration amount back to the applicants, along with interest and additional compensation. This pattern indicates a significant shortcoming on the builder’s part, as they were unable to fulfill contractual obligations, leading to legal consequences.

Common reasons for bringing cases to court included contesting delays in project delivery and disputes over the builder's accountability for these delays. The builder’s repeated loss in litigation suggests systemic issues, possibly related to project management, compliance with timelines, or adequate documentation of extenuating circumstances.

The consistent failure to secure favorable outcomes could be attributed to several factors, including insufficient evidence to support the defense of unforeseen circumstances, non-compliance with regulatory requirements governing timely possession, or a general lack of transparency in communications with buyers regarding project timelines and expectations.