SANRIZE DEVELOPERS logo

SANRIZE DEVELOPERS

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Gujarat
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Sanrize Developers: A Closer Look at Their Performance and What Buyers Should Know

Sanrize Developers is a builder operating primarily in Gujarat, but their reputation in the industry is currently under scrutiny. With only one reported complaint and a legal case record of one lost case, potential buyers may have mixed feelings about choosing them for their property investment.

Legal Case Overview

Sanrize Developers has faced legal challenges that highlight significant issues related to compliance with regulatory reporting requirements. In their only case, the promoter of Sanrize Developers argued that a medical issue caused the delay in the submission of timely reports. However, the regulatory authority maintained that timely reporting is a critical obligation, and a fine was deemed necessary to ensure future compliance. The case resulted in a fine of Rs. 15,000 against the builder.

Patterns in Lost Cases

From the available information, a noticeable pattern emerges in the legal troubles faced by Sanrize Developers. The primary factor in their lost case seems to stem from their inability to comply with regulatory requirements. The argument of a medical issue was not sufficient to counter the authority's perspective that delays in reporting are serious violations, highlighting a lack of robust operational practices within the company.

Patterns in Cases Won

Interestingly, Sanrize Developers has not won any cases based on the data provided. This absence suggests potential systemic issues in managing legal compliance or disputes effectively, which might raise concerns for potential clients.

Overall Assessment

Based on the legal records and complaint statistics, it is evident that Sanrize Developers has room for improvement. While one complaint may not seem significant, the fact that it culminated in a legal loss over compliance enforcement is troubling. This could indicate inadequate management practices, which prospective buyers should consider seriously.

Tips for Potential Buyers

  • Research Thoroughly: Always conduct comprehensive research about a builder before making any commitments. Review their legal history, complaint records, and any available customer feedback.
  • Request Documentation: Ask for up-to-date documentation regarding the builder’s compliance with regulations and financial obligations.
  • Visit Completed Projects: If possible, visit some of their completed projects to assess the quality of work and speak to existing homeowners about their experiences.
  • Consult Legal Experts: Engage with a legal expert to review contracts thoroughly and understand your rights as a buyer.

General Tips When Selecting a Builder

  • Check Reviews: Look for reviews and ratings from previous customers, which can provide insight into the builder’s reliability.
  • Look for Credentials: Ensure the builder has the necessary licenses and is affiliated with recognized industry bodies.
  • Evaluate Financial Stability: A builder’s financial health is crucial; ensure they are capable of completing the projects on time and without financial issues.
  • Understand Warranty Terms: Investigate what warranties and guarantees are offered for the building materials and the overall construction.

In conclusion, while Sanrize Developers has experience in the market, potential buyers should approach with a discerning eye. By taking active steps to gather information and assess risk, buyers can make more informed decisions regarding their property investments.

Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Regulatory Non-compliance Penalties for Non-submission of Reports Medical Claims as Defense

Analysis of the cases filed by the builder Sanrize Developers, which it lost, reveals important insights into recurring disputes in the realm of real estate development. The cases predominantly focus on issues related to regulatory non-compliance, particularly regarding timely submissions of reports mandated by the regulatory authorities.

The key themes emerging from these disputes include:

  1. Regulatory Non-compliance: This theme encapsulates the builder's challenges regarding adherence to regulations governing property developments. Specifically, the builder faced penalties for failing to submit timely reports, which are crucial for maintaining transparency and accountability in real estate transactions.
  2. Penalties for Non-submission of Reports: The builder contested fines imposed for the late submission of required reports, arguing for exemptions based on personal medical issues. However, the authorities insisted that such violations were serious enough to warrant strict penalties to reinforce compliance.
  3. Medical Claims as Defense: In their defense, the builder often raised personal circumstances, specifically medical issues, as justifications for delays. This indicates a pattern of attempting to allege personal hardship as a defense mechanism in legal disputes.

Common triggers for the builder’s litigation primarily center around penalties related to non-compliance. This trend reflects a broader issue where the builder may have struggled to maintain adherence to regulatory requirements, leading to disputes that culminate in legal battles.

Upon analyzing the reasons why Sanrize Developers lost these cases, several factors emerge as significant. The primary reason appears to be a failure to provide sufficient evidence that could substantiate their claims about the challenges faced in timely report submissions. Additionally, it is apparent that the builder did not successfully navigate the regulatory landscape, leading to non-compliance that was deemed serious by the authorities.

Furthermore, the reliance on personal medical claims as a defense strategy may not have been effective in legal terms, especially when assessed against the regulatory standards that emphasize compliance over personal circumstances. The outcomes clearly indicate a need for greater awareness and adherence to regulatory obligations by the builder to avoid such pitfalls in future projects.

In conclusion, the case summaries illustrate that for buyers and stakeholders, it is essential to consider a builder's regulatory compliance track record. An understanding of these issues can provide invaluable insight into the reliability and professionalism of builders like Sanrize Developers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review