SANSKRITI GROUP OF COMPANIES

Introduction

In the world of real estate, choosing a builder is a critical decision that can significantly impact the homeownership experience. One such entity, the Sanskriti Group of Companies, has faced considerable scrutiny through multiple legal battles and complaints. In this blog post, we'll dive into the legal track record of Sanskriti Group, providing potential buyers with an understanding of the builder's performance in the arena of consumer complaints.

Overview of Sanskriti Group of Companies

With a presence primarily in Punjab, Sanskriti Group of Companies has encountered a total of five complaints to date. Despite these complaints, the builder failed to win any of the cases, which raises concerns about their business practices and customer satisfaction.

Legal Case Outcomes

Among the five cases filed against Sanskriti Group:

• Number of Cases Won: 0
• Number of Cases Lost: 5

Summary of Lost Cases

Each of the five lost cases involved claims primarily centered around requests for refunds and interest due to the non-completion of projects. In particular, all cases revolved around:

• Failure to Start Development Work: Complainants claimed that the builder did not commence any construction work after receiving payments.
• Non-delivery of Possession: Buyers were unable to obtain possession of their purchased properties, leading to legal actions demanding refunds.
• Consequences of Non-response: In several instances, the builder failed to respond to the legal proceedings, resulting in ex-parte decisions against them. This implies a lack of defense or justification for their actions in the eyes of the legal authorities.

Overall, the common thread among these cases is the significant distress faced by homebuyers, who were led to believe they would receive tangible returns on their investments.

Summary of Cases Won

While Sanskriti Group of Companies has not won any cases, the analysis of their losses suggests that their inability to defend their practices convincingly in court may warrant caution among prospective buyers. The repetitive nature of refund requests without substantial responses from the builder highlights systemic issues in fulfilling consumer expectations.

Conclusion

Based on the information at hand, the Sanskriti Group of Companies presents certain red flags for potential buyers. An absence of successful defenses in legal disputes and multiple lost cases suggest a troubling pattern of customer dissatisfaction and unfulfilled commitments.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Do Your Research: Before making a decision, investigate the builder's reputation, project timelines, and past customer reviews.
2. Check Legal Standing: Look into the builder's history of complaints and legal actions to gauge their performance and reliability.
3. Demand Transparency: Ensure you receive clear and comprehensive information about your investment, along with realistic timelines for project completion.
4. Understand Legal Rights: Familiarize yourself with consumer rights and regulations governing real estate transactions to empower yourself in case of disputes.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

• Visit Past Projects: Inspect previously completed projects to assess quality and adherence to timelines.
• Ask for References: Speak with past customers to gain insight into their experiences, addressing both positive and negative aspects.
• Review Contracts Thoroughly: Ensure all agreements are spelled out clearly to avoid misunderstandings before, during, and after the building process.

In conclusion, while the prospect of owning a home is exciting, due diligence is essential. The Sanskriti Group of Companies serves as a reminder of the need for thorough investigation and careful consideration when choosing a builder.

Analysis of the cases filed against the Sanskriti Group of Companies, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into their business practices and the grievances of their clients. The cases primarily revolved around two common themes: refunds due to incomplete development and interest claims on unfulfilled allotments.

The majority of the cases involved claims made by buyers seeking refunds for amounts paid towards apartment bookings or plot allotments. In each instance, the complainants cited the builder's failure to initiate development work or deliver possession as the primary reason for their claims. This indicates a troubling pattern of behavior where buyers were left waiting for projects that were never started, or were stuck in limbo with no updates on their investments.

The reason people commonly brought these cases to court was rooted in the builder’s inability to fulfill their promises. Buyers felt cheated as they had made substantial financial investments without seeing any progress on their purchases. The builder's consistent failure to meet deadlines and begin work on the promised properties led to a loss of trust and subsequent litigation.

The outcomes of these cases highlight the weaknesses in the builder's defense. In several instances, there was no representation on behalf of the builder, leading to default judgments against them. Even when defenses were presented, they were insufficient to counter the evidence provided by the claimants, which typically included documentation of payments made and the lack of development progress. This suggests that the builder may have been non-compliant with legal or regulatory requirements governing real estate development, which further aggravated their losses in court.

In conclusion, the cases against the Sanskriti Group of Companies serve as a cautionary tale for potential buyers. They underline the importance of thorough due diligence before making any real estate investment. Buyers should be wary of builders with a history of litigation, unfinished projects, and a lack of transparency in their dealings. Understanding these red flags can help prevent financial losses and ensure a more secure investment in the real estate market.