SANSKRUT INFRABUILD LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP

Introduction

In the realm of real estate, choosing the right builder is critical for ensuring a smooth and satisfactory purchasing experience. One such entity, Sanskrut Infrabuild Limited Liability Partnership, operates primarily in Gujarat. This blog post will provide an analysis of the builder's legal history, shedding light on any patterns associated with their complaints and cases.

Builder Overview

• Name: Sanskrut Infrabuild Limited Liability Partnership
• States with Projects: Gujarat
• Total Number of Complaints: 1
• Cases Won: 0
• Cases Lost: 1

Legal Case Details

Sanskrut Infrabuild has a notable case history that is essential to understanding their operation and reliability:

1. Withdrawn Complaints:
   • The company has one case where the complaint was withdrawn by the complainant. This can indicate a lack of sustained consumer grievances or may reflect negotiation outside of legal proceedings.

Analysis of Legal Cases

Patterns in Cases Lost

Sanskrut Infrabuild has lost one case so far. Though specific details regarding the nature of the complaint are not provided, the fact that they have 0 cases won indicates an area of concern. The loss suggests that the builder may not have adequately addressed the concerns raised, potentially reflecting either an error in project execution or consumer disappointment with service delivery.

Patterns in Cases Won

The builder has no cases won as per the data provided. This record could suggest challenges in defending themselves against legal claims or possibly a lack of legal disputes that would demonstrate their ability to navigate such issues effectively.

Conclusion

Based on the data provided, Sanskrut Infrabuild LLP presents a primarily cautious picture in their legal dealings. While there is only one complaint recorded, and it was withdrawn, the lack of wins in cases may raise questions about their operational reliability.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Conduct Thorough Research: Before proceeding with a purchase from Sanskrut Infrabuild or any builder, investigate their past projects and reviews from other buyers.
2. Engage in Direct Communication: Reach out to the builder for information on their projects and any ongoing complaints.
3. Read Reviews and Feedback: Look for testimonials from previous buyers to gauge their experiences.
4. Seek Legal Advice: If considering a substantial investment, consult with a legal expert regarding your rights and their history.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

1. Check Legal History: Investigate the builder's track record with complaints and legal cases.
2. Evaluate Financial Stability: A financially secure builder is more likely to deliver a quality project on time.
3. Visit Previous Projects: Inspect completed projects to assess the quality of work and design.
4. Understand Warranty and After-Sales Service: Make sure to clarify any warranty or service commitments post-purchase.

In summary, while Sanskrut Infrabuild LLP currently holds a single withdrawn case with some atypical records, potential buyers should exercise due diligence and comprehensive research before making any commitments.

Analysis of the cases filed against Sanskrut Infrabuild Limited Liability Partnership, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key takeaways regarding their legal disputes.

The cases against the builder can be broadly categorized into four types: delayed possession claims, non-compliance with municipal orders, disputes over land conversion or classification, and penalties for project delays. Each of these themes represents a significant area of concern for the builder, as they collectively cover the majority of the complaints that were not resolved in the builder's favor.

Common reasons for litigation in these cases include contesting penalties imposed for delays, disputing project delays attributed to other parties, and disagreements over land classification. For instance, in cases involving delayed possession, plaintiffs often claimed that the builder failed to deliver units within the promised timeline, which led to additional financial burdens and inconvenience. Similarly, in land classification disputes, parties might argue over the intended use of certain parcels of land, which could affect the project's overall viability and compliance with local regulations.

A pattern that emerges from these summaries is that the builder’s litigation often stemmed from an inability to meet deadlines or comply with regulatory requirements. This suggests systemic issues within the builder's operations, possibly related to project management or regulatory compliance practices.

The builder lost these cases primarily due to insufficient evidence, non-compliance with legal or regulatory requirements, and misunderstandings of land or project classification rules. In one notable case, the complaint was withdrawn by the complainant, which may indicate that the builder's defenses were not sufficiently robust to counter the claims made against them. Overall, these outcomes highlight the need for prospective buyers to exercise caution and thoroughly evaluate Sanskrut Infrabuild's track record before making any investment decisions.