SANT BAGDANA INFA

Overview of Sant Bagdana Infa

Sant Bagdana Infa is a builder operating primarily in the state of Gujarat. Despite a limited presence in the industry, it has managed to engage in legal proceedings that shed light on its operational practices and customer relations. With only one documented complaint and losing the same case, it’s important to delve into the implications of these outcomes for potential buyers.

Legal Case Details

The builder was involved in a legal case concerning its project 'Swarna Amrit Heights'. The case filed against Sant Bagdana Infa highlighted issues around the timely submission of the annual audit report, an important aspect of project transparency and financial accountability.

• Appellant Claim: The claimant pointed out the failure of the builder to submit the annual audit report within the stipulated timeframe.
• Respondent Claim: In response, the builder explained its inability to fill Form-P on time, offering a written explanation for the delay.
• Final Verdict: The Authority ruled against the builder, imposing a fine of Rs. 25,000 and directing timely submission of the audit report moving forward.

Analysis of Legal Patterns

Common Factors in Cases Lost

Based on the single case lost by Sant Bagdana Infa, the primary factor appears to be related to compliance issues, specifically regarding reporting and documentation timelines. This suggests a potential lack of systematic adherence to regulatory requirements, which can pose risks for buyers in terms of transparency and accountability in project oversight.

Common Factors in Cases Won

Interestingly, while the builder has not won any cases outright, it should be noted that they did present a defense regarding procedural delays. The ability to submit a written explanation signifies a potential proactive approach in addressing grievances, though it did not result in a favorable outcome in this instance.

Conclusion

The performance of Sant Bagdana Infa in legal matters indicates a pressing issue with compliance and a need for improvement in administrative practices. The solitary complaint and loss in case highlight important considerations for potential buyers.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Due Diligence: Always perform thorough research on a builder's history, especially regarding legal complaints and case outcomes. Check for trends that could indicate systemic issues.
2. Project Transparency: Seek details about financial documents, such as annual audit reports, and ensure that these are submitted on time to maintain financial integrity.
3. Communication: Establish clear lines of communication with the builder. A builder's responsiveness can be a good indicator of their reliability.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

• Look for Reviews and References: Engage with previous buyers and read reviews online to gauge the builder's reputation.
• Check Licensing and Certifications: Ensure the builder is properly licensed and certified to operate in your state, which can provide an additional layer of security.
• Visit Project Sites: If possible, visit existing projects by the builder to assess construction quality firsthand.

Ultimately, while Sant Bagdana Infa has engaged in the market with some recorded complaints, potential buyers should weigh their options carefully and consider these insights to make informed decisions.

Analysis of the cases filed against builder Sant Bagdana Infa, which it lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases highlight ongoing issues in the builder's compliance with regulatory requirements, timely reporting on projects, and the resultant penalties for delays.

The first type of case involves Non-compliance with Regulatory Requirements. In these instances, the builder failed to adhere to the necessary rules governing real estate projects. A notable claim involved the builder's failure to submit an annual audit report for the 'Swarna Amrit Heights' project within the stipulated timeframe. This reflects a broader pattern of neglecting regulatory obligations, which typically leads to legal consequences.

Delays in Project Reporting emerge as another common theme. The builder's inability to furnish required documentation, such as annual audit reports, often resulted in claims that highlighted the importance of transparency and compliance in real estate ventures. These delays might stem from various factors, including insufficient resources or poor project management practices.

The Penalties for Project Delays serve as a direct consequence of the builder’s inability to meet regulatory standards and fulfill project obligations on time. In the case of 'Swarna Amrit Heights,' the builder was fined Rs. 25,000 and mandated to submit the overdue report within 30 days. This penalty indicates a systemic issue where delays not only hinder the builder's operations but also lead to financial repercussions.

The reasons people commonly bring cases against this builder include contesting penalties, disputing delays attributed to other parties, and disagreements over project classification. The patterns emerging from these summaries suggest that the builder’s litigation often stems from a combination of non-compliance with regulations and mismanagement of project timelines.

The common reasons for the builder's losses in these cases include insufficient evidence to support their claims, failure to comply with legal or regulatory requirements, and misunderstandings of project classification rules. This underscores the importance of diligent adherence to regulations and effective management practices in the real estate sector.