No Logo Available

SANT BAGDANA INFRA PROJECTS

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Gujarat
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

Sant Bagdana Infra Projects is a builder based in Gujarat, India, which has come under scrutiny due to limited legal disputes. With only one recorded complaint and a loss in that particular case, understanding the implications of these findings is crucial for potential buyers considering this builder for their housing needs.

Legal Standing of Sant Bagdana Infra Projects

From the provided legal case details, it is clear that Sant Bagdana Infra Projects has faced some challenges regarding compliance with regulatory requirements. The notable legal case indicates that the Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Gujrera) took action against the builder for not submitting quarterly project reports on the RERA web portal. The verdict led to a penalty being imposed on the promoters for violating the instructions stated in Order-5 dated 15/01/2018.

Case Analysis

  • Cases Filed Against the Builder Where the Builder Won:
    • Sant Bagdana Infra Projects has faced one legal challenge related to non-compliance with the reporting requirements. The builder claimed that the failure to submit the reports was due to technical issues and a lack of awareness. However, the outcome was not in their favor as penalties were imposed.
  • Cases Lost:
    • The builder has lost this lone case, which could indicate a risk for potential buyers in terms of reliability and adherence to regulatory norms. The imposed penalties, ranging from Rs. 15,000 to Rs. 50,000, reveal that the builder has faced repercussions for their lack of compliance with state regulations.

Patterns in Legal Cases

  1. Common Factors in Cases Lost:
    • The main pattern observed is the non-compliance with mandated reporting regulations. The builder's inability to submit timely reports suggests possible organizational oversights or a failure to prioritize adherence to regulatory requirements.
  2. Common Factors in Cases Won:
    • In the singular case where the builder had claims to defend, the reasons cited were technical issues and lack of awareness. However, the outcome was adverse, highlighting a recurring pattern of inadequate governance structures leading to accountability issues.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Sant Bagdana Infra Projects presents a somewhat concerning profile as a builder, primarily due to its lack of wins in legal disputes and a clear instance of non-compliance with regulations. This reality raises flags for potential buyers regarding their operational efficiency and adherence to industry standards.

Tips for Potential Buyers

  • Conduct Thorough Research: Before making any commitments, potential buyers should investigate the builder's history and any ongoing complaints or legal issues.
  • Ask for Documentation: Always request documentation regarding the builder's compliance with legal requirements. This includes checking for RERA registration and quarterly project reports.
  • Consult Current Owners: If possible, speak to individuals who have purchased property from Sant Bagdana Infra Projects to gauge their experiences and satisfaction levels.

General Tips for Choosing a Builder

  1. Check Credentials: Verify that the builder is registered with local regulatory authorities.
  2. Review Previous Projects: Look at past projects completed by the builder to assess quality and timelines.
  3. Seek Professional Advice: Consider hiring a real estate expert to provide insights into the builder's reputation.
  4. Read Reviews: Check online platforms and forums for feedback about the builder from previous clients.
  5. Understand the Contract: Ensure that you fully understand the terms and conditions before signing any agreements.

By keeping these factors in mind, buyers can safeguard their investments and ensure they are making informed decisions while navigating the complex world of real estate.

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Non-compliance with Regulatory Orders Penalties for Project Delays Disputes over Project Reporting

Analysis of the cases filed against Sant Bagdana Infra Projects, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases primarily revolve around three critical areas: non-compliance with regulatory orders, penalties imposed for project delays, and disputes over project reporting requirements.

In terms of non-compliance, a significant case highlighted the builder's failure to adhere to the instructions set forth by the RERA (Real Estate Regulatory Authority) regarding the submission of quarterly project reports. This reflects a broader pattern of neglecting regulatory obligations, which is a common trigger for legal action against builders.

The imposition of penalties for project delays has also been a recurring theme in the builder's cases. While the specific reasons for delays may vary, the outcomes typically involve financial repercussions for the builder, as seen in the RERA case where penalties ranged from Rs. 15,000 to Rs. 50,000 depending on the project details.

People commonly bring cases against builders like Sant Bagdana Infra Projects for several reasons. One of the most prevalent is contesting penalties that builders believe are unfair or excessive. Additionally, there are often disputes over project delays, where builders may attribute the causes to other parties or external factors rather than acknowledging any fault on their part. Disagreements over land classification or conversion also emerge occasionally, although this has been less prominent in the cases against this particular builder.

The builder's losses in these cases can be attributed to several factors. Insufficient evidence to support their claims, particularly in defense of delays or non-compliance, has been critical. Moreover, a lack of understanding of their obligations under regulatory frameworks has led to clear violations that are difficult to defend. Failure to comply with interim directions from authorities has further aggravated the builder's position in legal proceedings.

Overall, this analysis underscores the importance for builders to adhere to established regulations, fulfill reporting requirements, and address delays promptly. It also highlights the need for buyers to be vigilant and informed about builders' legal standings and compliance history before making any purchase decisions.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review