CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
In the realm of real estate, selecting the right builder is crucial. This blog post delves into Sant Kawarram Builders Private Limited, analyzing its legal standing and performance based on the number of complaints and outcomes of cases against it.
Sant Kawarram Builders Private Limited has faced 4 legal complaints, all of which resulted in losses for the builder. This raises red flags for potential buyers considering investment in their projects in Madhya Pradesh.
The details of the cases are as follows:
The builder faced losses in all cases, indicating a recurring issue with the non-completion of projects and failure to provide possession as agreed. In each instance, there was a consistent theme of complaints regarding:
Interestingly, the builder has yet to win a single case, which perpetuates a concerning legal reputation. The consistent loss highlights a potential inability to fulfill contractual obligations and could jeopardize trust with potential customers.
Based on the provided legal outcomes, it becomes evident that Sant Kawarram Builders Private Limited has a troubling reputation marked by unfulfilled projects and legal failures. All four cases have resulted in losses for the builder, which raises significant concerns for potential buyers.
In conclusion, potential buyers should approach Sant Kawarram Builders Private Limited with caution, given their legal history and lack of favorable outcomes.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against Sant Kawarram Builders Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into the recurring themes surrounding their disputes.
The cases can be primarily grouped into three common themes: Delayed Possession Claims, Disputes over Payment and Completion, and Compensation for Mental Distress and Expenses.
The Delayed Possession Claims highlight instances where the builder failed to complete construction work on schedule, resulting in a lack of possession delivery to buyers despite having received full payment. The builder consistently attributed these delays to unforeseen circumstances; however, the adjudicating officer ruled against this defense, indicating a lack of validity in their reasoning.
Disputes over Payment and Completion showcase a pattern where the builder contested the amount paid by buyers, claiming that full payment had not been received and thus, possession could not be granted. However, the evidence presented did not support these claims, leading to decisions in favor of the applicants.
The need for Compensation for Mental Distress and Expenses was a common factor in the verdicts, where buyers were awarded compensation not only for the delayed possession but also for the emotional distress and financial burdens imposed on them throughout the disputes.
A striking pattern emerges from these summaries: the builder’s repeated attribution of delays to unforeseen circumstances was not accepted as a valid defense. This, coupled with a consistent failure to acknowledge the full payment received from buyers, resulted in legal losses. The builder's inability to meet deadlines and fulfill contractual obligations led to legal consequences, emphasizing the importance of transparency and adherence to commitments in the real estate sector.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!