| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the vast landscape of real estate builders, SAPTAK BUILDCON stands as a notable entity, particularly in Gujarat. In this article, we will explore the builder's track record, including legal cases and the implications for potential buyers.
Builder Overview
- Name: SAPTAK BUILDCON
- Number of Complaints: 1
- Cases Won: 0
- Cases Lost: 1
- States with Projects: Gujarat
Legal Case Details
SAPTAK BUILDCON has faced legal scrutiny, with one notable case that culminated in a loss for the builder. The details of this case offer critical insights into their operations and compliance with the law.
- Case Summary:
- Appellant Claim: The appellant accused SAPTAK BUILDCON of failing to submit quarterly reports promptly, thereby violating the RERA Act and its associated rules.
- Respondent Claim: The builder, in this instance, contended a lack of awareness regarding the law and expressed regret for any inadvertent violation. Additionally, they requested leniency in penalties.
- Final Verdict: The …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against SAPTAK BUILDCON, where the builder lost, reveals several key points across the disputes raised. The cases highlight key themes surrounding non-compliance with the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) Act and rules, as well as the imposition of penalties for late submission of mandatory reports.
The first type of case involves the builder's failure to adhere to the RERA Act by not submitting quarterly reports on time. This reflects a broader pattern of non-compliance with regulatory requirements, which is a common theme in real estate disputes. The builder's defense—that they were unaware of the law and had no intention to violate it—indicates a significant lack of diligence and understanding of their obligations under the Act.
The primary reason people brought cases to court in this instance was to contest the builder's non-compliance, which resulted in a direct penalty imposed by the authority. The builder's regret …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!