SARE JUBILEE SHELTERS PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

When it comes to choosing a builder for your dream home, it’s imperative to consider their track record and customer satisfaction levels. One firm that stands out in Tamil Nadu is Sare Jubilee Shelters Private Limited. With a mixed record of case outcomes, understanding this builder's history can help potential buyers make informed decisions.

Company Overview

Sare Jubilee Shelters Private Limited is a real estate developer operating primarily in Tamil Nadu. As a builder, the company is tasked with transforming land into livable spaces, catering to various segments of the housing market.

Legal Case Details

In legal terms, Sare Jubilee Shelters Private Limited appears to have faced challenges. To date, the company has received 1 complaint, which directly resulted in legal action. Here’s a breakdown of the cases:

• Cases Filed Against the Builder: 1
• Cases Won: 0
• Cases Lost: 1

Summary of the Cases

The sole case against Sare Jubilee Shelters involved complaints regarding:

• Delay in handing over possession of a flat
• Service deficiency
• Negligence in the project

The respondent (builder) agreed to initiate the cancellation procedure within 120 days; however, the complaint was ultimately withdrawn by the appellant, indicating a resolution that did not necessitate a win or loss in the traditional sense.

Analysis of Legal Outcomes

Patterns in Lost Cases

Given that Sare Jubilee Shelters has lost 1 case, it highlights a significant theme of client dissatisfaction due to delays and perceived service inadequacies.

• Common Factors: Delays in delivery timelines and issues related to project execution seem to be the prevalent reasons for complaints. Such factors can considerably affect client trust and the overall reputation of the builder.

Patterns in Won Cases

In the case that has been withdrawn, while technically not a win, it does signify a willingness on the part of the builder to address concerns through dialogue or procedural undertakings, which can be seen as a positive aspect of client relations.

• Common Factors: The builder’s ability to respond with procedural resolutions may indicate an intent to maintain customer relations despite complaints.

Conclusion

Considering the available data, Sare Jubilee Shelters Private Limited's track record reflects challenges that potential buyers should heed. The absence of won cases suggests that there may be underlying issues that could affect future buyers, particularly regarding project completion timelines and service quality.

Tips for Potential Buyers

• Research: Always conduct thorough research regarding any builder's past performance, particularly in their response to client complaints and legal issues.
• Visit Existing Projects: Whenever possible, visit completed projects from the builder to gauge quality and client satisfaction directly.
• Review Contracts Carefully: Pay close attention to timelines and terms of service in contracts to safeguard personal interests.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

• Check Credentials: Verify licenses and any regulatory compliance to ensure legitimacy and reliability.
• Read Reviews: Take the time to read customer reviews and testimonials to gain insight into the builder's reputation.
• Engage in Discussions: Reach out to previous clients for firsthand accounts of their experiences, which can provide valuable insights.

In conclusion, while Sare Jubilee Shelters Private Limited has established its presence in Tamil Nadu, potential buyers are advised to proceed cautiously by applying due diligence in their purchasing decision.

Analysis of the cases filed against Sare Jubilee Shelters Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes and patterns. The primary disputes can be categorized into two main topics: Delayed Possession Claims and Service Deficiency and Negligence.

The cases often involved claims from the appellants regarding delays in the possession of flats, which reflects a common concern among buyers regarding timely delivery of properties. This theme highlights the friction that can occur between builders and buyers when expected timelines aren't met, leading to dissatisfaction and legal action.

Additionally, there were allegations of service deficiency and negligence in the project, indicating that buyers felt the quality of work or the services provided by the builder were inadequate. This raises a critical point about the builder's operational capabilities and the need for buyers to be vigilant when evaluating construction quality and services delivered by builders.

The reasons people commonly brought cases to court revolved around these delays and service complaints. Buyers contested the builder’s performance, arguing that there was insufficient action taken to rectify significant issues. The builder’s defense often included commitments to resolve the situation, such as agreeing to initiate cancellation procedures within specified timelines. However, the underlying patterns suggest a systemic issue with adherence to timelines and quality standards, which likely contributed to the legal outcomes.

The common reasons for the builder's losses in these cases center around their inability to meet the expectations established through contractual obligations, particularly concerning possession delivery timelines and quality assurance. While the specifics of each case vary, the consistent themes of delay and negligence indicate broader operational shortcomings that hindered the builder's ability to defend against claims effectively.