SARTHAK BUILDER & DEVELOPER

Introduction

In the competitive realm of real estate, understanding the reputation and track record of a builder is essential before making a purchase. In this post, we will explore the details surrounding Sarthak Builder & Developer, a construction venture based in Madhya Pradesh, focusing on their legal history, complaints, and the implications for potential buyers.

Overview of Sarthak Builder & Developer

Sarthak Builder & Developer operates within Madhya Pradesh, offering diverse residential opportunities. Despite being a singular player in the market, the builder has faced some legal challenges that could affect buyer perception.

Legal Background

Case Overview

• Number of Complaints: 1
• Cases Won: 0
• Cases Lost: 1

Details of the Legal Case

In an interesting twist, Sarthak Builder & Developer has been embroiled in a legal case where the builder lost. The case revolved around the following key points:

• Appellant's Claim: The applicant accused Sarthak Builder & Developer of failing to grant possession of the flat within the agreed time frame, seeking compensation and interest.
• Respondent's Claim: The builder countered that the applicant had not fulfilled the complete payment, requesting dismissal of the complaint.
• Final Verdict: The adjudicating officer ruled against Sarthak Builder & Developer, ordering them to pay the consideration amount along with interest and compensation to the appellant.

Analysis of Legal Trends

Cases Won

• Notably, Sarthak Builder & Developer has not won any legal cases against them. This lack of success raises questions about their operational practices and their ability to defend against claims made by clients.

Cases Lost

• The sole lost case reflects a common theme of possession disputes and delayed handovers, often a critical concern for homebuyers.
• The builder's claim regarding incomplete payments points toward potential issues with communication or customer satisfaction, indicating a possible breakdown in the transaction process.

Conclusion

Based on the provided data, Sarthak Builder & Developer has faced challenges in the legal sphere, culminating in one lost case that highlights significant concerns regarding possession and timely delivery of property.

For potential buyers considering Sarthak Builder & Developer, it is essential to:

• Conduct thorough due diligence regarding project timelines and past delays.
• Read customer reviews and consult with previous buyers to gauge satisfaction levels.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Investigate Project Timelines: Ensure the builder has a history of delivering on time. Delays can lead to significant inconveniences and financial strain.
2. Request Documentation: Before making any commitments, ask for all contracts, payment schedules, and warranties.
3. Know Your Rights: Familiarize yourself with consumer laws related to real estate in your region for better protection.
4. Seek Professional Advice: Consult with real estate experts or legal advisors to ensure a secure purchase.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

• Reputation Check: Research the builder’s reputation thoroughly, looking at both complaints and successful projects.
• Quality of Construction: Visit existing projects to assess the quality and craftsmanship, ensuring they align with your expectations.
• Financial Stability: Confirm that the builder is financially sound to avoid potential project halts or complications.
• Communication & Support: Choose a builder known for excellent communication and customer service to ensure a smoother experience.

In summary, while Sarthak Builder & Developer may offer attractive projects in Madhya Pradesh, potential buyers should exercise caution and conduct thorough research before proceeding.

Analysis of the cases filed against Sarthak Builder & Developer, where the builder lost, reveals several key insights into their litigation patterns. The cases can be broadly categorized into two themes: Delayed Possession Claims and Disputes over Payment and Consideration.

The first type, Delayed Possession Claims, involves cases where the applicant alleged that the builder failed to grant possession of the flat within the agreed-upon timeframe. This is a common theme in real estate disputes and typically arises when buyers feel that the builder has unreasonably delayed their ability to move into the property. In the case summarized, the applicant sought compensation and interest for this delay, indicating a growing trend where buyers expect timely possession and are willing to seek damages for delays.

The second theme, Disputes over Payment and Consideration, centers around the builder's claim that the applicant had not paid the full consideration amount owed. This highlights another frequent area of contention in real estate transactions, where parties often disagree over payment amounts or timelines. Here, the builder sought to dismiss the complaint based on alleged non-payment, but ultimately lost the case, suggesting that their defense was not sufficiently robust or that they failed to comply with payment regulations.

A pattern emerges from these summaries: cases against Sarthak Builder & Developer often involve either delays in delivering property or disputes related to financial obligations. Buyers commonly contest delays and seek penalties, while builders like Sarthak often counter with claims of non-payment or seek to attribute delays to other parties.

The builder's losses in these cases likely stem from several factors, including insufficient evidence to support their claims, failure to deliver property on time, or non-compliance with payment agreements. The verdict in the summarized case, which ordered the builder to pay consideration amounts with interest and compensation, further indicates that builders who do not meet their contractual obligations can expect legal repercussions.