SARTHAK REAL BUILT PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

Sarthak Real Built Private Limited has established itself in the realm of real estate in Madhya Pradesh. However, as with any builder, especially in a sector fraught with complexities, potential buyers should tread carefully. In this article, we delve into the builder's legal history, the outcomes of their cases, and provide invaluable insights for prospective buyers.

Legal Overview

Sarthak Real Built Private Limited faces a troubling legal history with 4 complaints lodged against them, all culminating in losses for the builder. The data shows that the builder has encountered significant difficulty in legal matters, with no cases winning in their favor. This raises red flags for prospective customers regarding the builder's reliability and the quality of service they provide.

Analysis of Legal Cases

Patterns in Cases Lost

1. Failure to Deliver on Promises: A recurring theme in the complaints against Sarthak Real Built is the failure to provide possession of plots and complete the promised development work. In each case, applicants claimed that they were either not provided with their property or faced unfulfilled promises regarding infrastructure.
2. Neglect of Communication: The builder has demonstrated a lack of responsiveness to complaints, as highlighted in the claims. This absence of communication has likely intensified the dissatisfaction among buyers, contributing to the formal complaints and legal actions.
3. Mental Agony and Financial Loss: Multiple complainants noted the emotional and financial toll inflicted by the builder's unfulfilled commitments. This has been a significant factor in their litigations, influencing the adjudicating bodies to rule in favor of the complainants.

Patterns in Cases Won

Interestingly, while Sarthak Real Built has lost all its cases, the underlying reasons for their victories in resolved disputes indicate some lessons:

1. Settlement Agreements: In cases that were ultimately disposed of, it appears that the disputes were resolved through settlements. This suggests that negotiation and compromise may sometimes prevail, albeit not in favor of the builder's initial conduct.
2. Conditioned Outcomes: Some cases involved authorities directing actions to be taken by the complainants, such as filling unusable wells and flattening plots. This indicates that regulatory bodies are sometimes providing responses that suggest shared responsibility or acknowledgment of inspection duties by buyers.

Conclusion

Considering the data, Sarthak Real Built Private Limited exhibits a concerning profile, particularly regarding their legal dealings. With all four complaints resulting in losses for the builder, potential buyers should proceed with caution. Here are some tips for navigating your real estate investment in relation to this builder:

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Thorough Research: Investigate past projects and reviews from previous buyers to assess overall satisfaction and experiences with the builder.
2. Demand Transparency: Ensure full disclosure of terms and conditions before making any commitments or transactions.
3. Get Everything in Writing: Documentation is vital. Secure written agreements on possession, development timelines, and any additional features or amenities.
4. Consult Legal Advice: If you're seriously considering a property purchase, it might be prudent to consult with a legal professional who specializes in real estate.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

1. Check Credentials: Investigate the builder’s reputation, the number of projects completed, and feedback from customers to gauge reliability.
2. Examine Financial Health: Look for information on the builder's financial stability to ensure they are capable of meeting project timelines and commitments.
3. Investigate Legal History: Be aware of any legal disputes or complaints against the builder that could impact your purchase.
4. Visit Sample Projects: If possible, visit completed projects or talk to current residents about their experiences to get a sense of the quality of the work.

In conclusion, while Sarthak Real Built Private Limited operates in Madhya Pradesh's real estate sector, potential buyers should weigh the legal implications heavily before proceeding with a purchase.

Analysis of the cases filed against Sarthak Real Built Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into the recurring themes surrounding their legal disputes.

The cases can be broadly categorized into three themes: Delayed Possession Claims, Disputes over Development Work and Quality, and Excess Payment and Financial Disputes.

Delayed Possession Claims encompassed cases where the applicants primarily complained about the builder's failure to provide possession of their booked plots on time, which led to mental distress and financial losses. The builder's defense often revolved around claims of completed development work and possession delivery, but the outcomes suggest a disconnect between the builder's assertions and the reality faced by the applicants.

Disputes over Development Work and Quality involved allegations of inadequate or unfinished development work on the plots. In some instances, specific issues like unusable wells on the plots were highlighted, demonstrating not just a lack of timely possession but also a lack of assurance in the quality of the developments made by the builder.

Excess Payment and Financial Disputes centered around claims of financial overcharging, with applicants stating that they were charged excessively for their plots. This indicates a potential systemic issue in the builder's pricing strategies or financial dealings.

Common reasons for bringing cases to court included: contesting delayed possession, disputing the quality and completion of development work, and challenging financial charges imposed by the builder. A consistent pattern observed was the builder's inability to meet the expectations established during the sale process, leading to multiple lawsuits.

The builder lost these cases primarily due to a lack of substantive evidence supporting their claims of timely possession and quality development work. Additionally, failures to address specific grievances about plot conditions and pricing raised by the applicants appeared to undermine the builder's defenses further.